On my 5th year of riding I was wrecking old geezers with 45 years of experience on track.
On my 9th of riding, I got destroyed by some French dude with 3 years of experience on track.
Years of experience mean absolutely nothing in anything. You can spend 45 years making the same mistakes and not realizing your blindspots with any activity involving a high skill ceiling.
Here's an idea: you, Lightcycle, and I hit up a race track and see who's faster. I have a feeling the answer will be Lightcycle >>> Me >>>>>>>>>>>>> you.
P.S. My bike doesn't work right now though so gimme a few months lol
UHMMMMMM
The question I was answering was if one could trail brake using the rear brake.
So you're saying that my 45 years of using a rear brake to trail brake is a delusion? OK
Then try to make my answer into a pissing contest.
Sorry I don't want to play your reindeer games
But your 2:19 at Shannonville, against a 1:43 lap record tells me you've REALLY got nothin' to say.
That's 139% of the lap record, if you had to qualify, that time wouldn't even get you in the big show.
OK, I'll play a little:
... I don't remember any of my Shannonville times on a big bike, but the last time I was at a race weekend at Mosport I was doing 1:43s, on a 42 year old 400cc street bike. About 1/2 a second off the class record.
I do remember breaking 2:07 at Shannonville long track, on a Norton Commando, in the mid '90's, on skinny 18" bias ply tires.
Got 2nd place at the John Nelson memorial on a bike, a Gus Kuhn Norton, that I met for the first time on the Thursday before the race.
I'll be at the DOCC Mosport track day in August, come on out to play. I'll be the guy with the oldest bikes there... trail braking with the rear brake.