Went and kicked the tires of a '06 Virago 250 last night with wife, looking for something for her to start her riding career on.
Engine sounded good, clutch was fine. Felt a little bit of exhaust leak from the lower muffler joint. Couple of little scratches and dings, here and there, but what "beginner" bike that is 10 years old, wouldn't.
Did a short buzz around the neighborhood. Nothing apparently wrong. Mileage was under 8k.
Woman bought it from a shop about 3 years ago, has had it maintained by same shop. However, hadn't picked up the Used Vehicle Information Package, nor had she seen one, when she bought it. I told her I was interested, but wanted to see the UVIP first.
Due to her work schedule, it would be the weekend before she could get one, so I went and got one for the bike today at lunch.
There are a couple of discrepancies. It was first registered in 2010, which seems odd for a 2006 bike. Secondly, Humber college was the first registrant. They kept it for 3 years, then transferred ownership to the shop.
Being a trainer, the mileage is probably way off. Don't most schools remove the speedo/odometer? As well, it probably sat and idled a lot, so I'd be concerned about upper cylinder wear. As I said, clutch seemed strong, and putting in new clutch plates/springs myself, isn't that big a deal. Now that I know the bikes history, I'd want to check the compression on it, before committing though.
Anyway, I contacted the seller again, and brought up the fact that it was a trainer, and she was surprised/annoyed that it was never disclosed to her.
So, now I'm on the fence. Wife loved the bike and the seller seemed open to negotiating the price down, based on the new information. But am I going to get stuck with something that I will have trouble reselling in a couple years, when she is ready to upgrade?
Would you buy a bike that was used as a trainer?
Engine sounded good, clutch was fine. Felt a little bit of exhaust leak from the lower muffler joint. Couple of little scratches and dings, here and there, but what "beginner" bike that is 10 years old, wouldn't.
Did a short buzz around the neighborhood. Nothing apparently wrong. Mileage was under 8k.
Woman bought it from a shop about 3 years ago, has had it maintained by same shop. However, hadn't picked up the Used Vehicle Information Package, nor had she seen one, when she bought it. I told her I was interested, but wanted to see the UVIP first.
Due to her work schedule, it would be the weekend before she could get one, so I went and got one for the bike today at lunch.
There are a couple of discrepancies. It was first registered in 2010, which seems odd for a 2006 bike. Secondly, Humber college was the first registrant. They kept it for 3 years, then transferred ownership to the shop.
Being a trainer, the mileage is probably way off. Don't most schools remove the speedo/odometer? As well, it probably sat and idled a lot, so I'd be concerned about upper cylinder wear. As I said, clutch seemed strong, and putting in new clutch plates/springs myself, isn't that big a deal. Now that I know the bikes history, I'd want to check the compression on it, before committing though.
Anyway, I contacted the seller again, and brought up the fact that it was a trainer, and she was surprised/annoyed that it was never disclosed to her.
So, now I'm on the fence. Wife loved the bike and the seller seemed open to negotiating the price down, based on the new information. But am I going to get stuck with something that I will have trouble reselling in a couple years, when she is ready to upgrade?
Would you buy a bike that was used as a trainer?
Last edited: