I would hazard a guess that since he's a journalist, his editor asked him to write the article. Something that wasn't a product review, ruffle a few feathers maybe (which he clearly did).
I didn't think it was fear-mongering, since he didn't advocate banning motorcycles and clearly loves them. Pointing out that statistics, chance and physics don't go away because you THINK you're competent isn't a bad lesson to offer.
He reassessed the risk after the accident and came to his own conclusion based on his own changing priorities. It's difficult for people to accept in a society drenched in marketing, but sometimes consumer products aren't as important as we think.
I didn't think it was fear-mongering, since he didn't advocate banning motorcycles and clearly loves them. Pointing out that statistics, chance and physics don't go away because you THINK you're competent isn't a bad lesson to offer.
He reassessed the risk after the accident and came to his own conclusion based on his own changing priorities. It's difficult for people to accept in a society drenched in marketing, but sometimes consumer products aren't as important as we think.