XenoVibe
Well-known member
Wow what a sad case the justice system has become.. are there anymore details surfacing?
I hope she gets throw out of court, and then I hope her neighbors force them right out of the province. How do you sue some one for trauma that your actions caused in the first place?
How do you sue some one for trauma that your actions caused in the first place?
Kids were riding three abreast, wearing dark clothes with zero reflective surface anywhere on the bikes or themselves at 1:30 in the morning.
I live close to there and the side roads where the speed is 80, i can see being in that exact situation.
The accident was analyzed and she was found not responsible in the death of the kid. That ofcourse didnt stop the parents of the child, in their grieving blindness to sue her anyways.
Her counter-suit is nothing more than what any competent lawyer would have done.
You boys remember the story of the kid who got smashed at a bar, drove (or tried to) himself and three friends and ended up killing himself and the passengers? In his infinitive "everyone is to blame but my child" wisdom, the father sued the bar, sued the bartender and fought hard to enact a law that 21 and younger cant have any alcohol whatsoever even if they have their G.
First of all.... her husband is a cop. Of course she was found not responsible. The shock there is overwhelming
Second, I know the accident you're referring to as my step dad's client was the first guy on scene who called 911. There's a huge difference in suing the person who fed your kid and his friends however many drinks (I recall it being many just not the exact number) that's part of operating a bar or serving. They technically should have been cut off long before they were.
This chick is just a blind idiot and I lived there too. Even at 100 at night with black bikes and kids dressed all in black the only way you don't see them is you're blind. That's a flat stretch and you can see well ahead of you even on a rainy night.
I'm not supporting her but if its raining & wearing black, it might be hard. She could be out driving her lights
Ask S. Brian Wilson...
\
Kids were riding three abreast, wearing dark clothes with zero reflective surface anywhere on the bikes or themselves at 1:30 in the morning.
I live close to there and the side roads where the speed is 80, i can see being in that exact situation.
The accident was analyzed and she was found not responsible in the death of the kid. That ofcourse didnt stop the parents of the child, in their grieving blindness to sue her anyways.
Her counter-suit is nothing more than what any competent lawyer would have done.
You boys remember the story of the kid who got smashed at a bar, drove (or tried to) himself and three friends and ended up killing himself and the passengers? In his infinitive "everyone is to blame but my child" wisdom, the father sued the bar, sued the bartender and fought hard to enact a law that 21 and younger cant have any alcohol whatsoever even if they have their G.
I disagree because a "competent" lawyer would know that such a lawsuit has very little chance to stand up in court. Suing because of suing is not a good idea, much less if it brings all kind of bad press and negative opinions against her. She is going to lose, and on top is looking as the biggest c*** in the world? Not a good lawyer.
Just my 2 cents. Let's see what happens...
This chick is just a blind idiot and I lived there too. Even at 100 at night with black bikes and kids dressed all in black the only way you don't see them is you're blind. That's a flat stretch and you can see well ahead of you even on a rainy night.
I almost ran over a couple people at night once. Sometimes, people are stupid. Incredible, I know.
Your opinion ion doesn't matter, it's a standard practice. Look it up.