We're ****ed

CruisnGrrl

Well-known member
Site Supporter
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/11/end-abx/


[h=1]When We Lose Antibiotics, Here’s Everything Else We’ll Lose Too[/h]




A colony of an Actinomycetes bacteria taken at 140x magnification.Image courtesy Biology101.org/Flickr

This week, health authorities in New Zealand announced that the tightly quarantined island nation — the only place I’ve ever been where you get x-rayed on the way into the country as well as leaving it — has experienced its first case, and first death, from a strain of totally drug-resistant bacteria. From theNew Zealand Herald:
In January, while he was teaching English in Vietnam, (Brian) Pool suffered a brain hemorrhage and was operated on in a Vietnamese hospital.
He was flown to Wellington Hospital where tests found he was carrying the strain of bacterium known as KPC-Oxa 48 – an organism that rejects every kind of antibiotic.
Wellington Hospital clinical microbiologist Mark Jones (said): “Nothing would touch it. Absolutely nothing. It’s the first one that we’ve ever seen that is resistant to every single antibiotic known.”
Pool’s death is an appalling tragedy. But it is also a lesson, twice over: It illustrates that antibiotic resistance can spread anywhere, no matter the defenses we put up — and it demonstrates that we are on the verge of entering a new era in history. Jones, the doctor who treated Pool, says in the story linked above: “This man was in the post-antibiotic era.”
“Post-antibiotic era” is a phrase that gets tossed around a lot these days, most of the time without people stopping to consider what it might really mean. A year ago, I started wondering what life would be like, if we really didn’t have antibiotics any more. I was commissioned and edited by got research support from (editing to make clear that they didn’t give me a grant; they don’t do that) the fantasticFood and Environment Reporting Network, and today Medium publishes our 4,000-word report, “Imagining a Post-Antibiotics Future” — a view from the far side of the antibiotic miracle.
If we really lost antibiotics to advancing drug resistance — and trust me, we’re not far off — here’s what we would lose. Not just the ability to treat infectious disease; that’s obvious.
But also: The ability to treat cancer, and to transplant organs, because doing those successfully relies on suppressing the immune system and willingly making ourselves vulnerable to infection. Any treatment that relies on a permanent port into the bloodstream — for instance, kidney dialysis. Any major open-cavity surgery, on the heart, the lungs, the abdomen. Any surgery on a part of the body that already harbors a population of bacteria: the guts, the bladder, the genitals. Implantable devices: new hips, new knees, new heart valves. Cosmetic plastic surgery. Liposuction. Tattoos.
We’d lose the ability to treat people after traumatic accidents, as major as crashing your car and as minor as your kid falling out of a tree. We’d lose the safety of modern childbirth: Before the antibiotic era, 5 women died out of every 1,000 who gave birth. One out of every nine skin infections killed. Three out of every 10 people who got pneumonia died from it.
And we’d lose, as well, a good portion of our cheap modern food supply. Most of the meat we eat in the industrialized world is raised with the routine use of antibiotics, to fatten livestock and protect them from the conditions in which the animals are raised. Without the drugs that keep livestock healthy in concentrated agriculture, we’d lose the ability to raise them that way. Either animals would sicken, or farmers would have to change their raising practices, spending more money when their margins are thin. Either way, meat — and fish and seafood, also raised with abundant antibiotics in the fish farms of Asia — would become much more expensive.
And it wouldn’t be just meat. Antibiotics are used in plant agriculture as well, especially on fruit. Right now, a drug-resistant version of the bacterial disease fire blight is attacking American apple crops. There’s currently one drug left to fight it. And when major crops are lost, the local farm economy goes too.
Joe McKenna, around 1933. (c. McKenna family)

If you’ve been reading here a while, you’ll know that I write about antibiotic resistance, in human medicine and in agriculture, all the time (and wrote a bookabout it). But something personal propelled me into this story. By random chance, I received a copy of the obit of my great-uncle, my grandfather’s younger brother Joe.
I’d heard about Joe as I was growing up, because everyone said my father resembled him. All I knew was that he was good-looking, and died young, and there was something about his death that was tragic. He was a New York City fireman, and I always assumed he’d died in a fire. I was wrong. He died of an infection, 5 years before penicillin came on the scene.
Joe’s death was protracted, and terrible, and it changed my family forever. Seventy-five years later, we would like to think that deaths like his are impossible. But they aren’t; as the story from New Zealand shows, they are happening again. We have a few chances left to turn back the tide of resistance — but only a few, and not much room for mistakes. I hope we take them.
 
People have been taking antibiotics like its been candy for many many years, at the same time big pharma stopped coming up with new ones cause there isn't a whole lot of money in it.

What can you do...its only a matter of time
 
The world is overpopulated with humans. But nature always acts to put things back into balance. Something's got to give, and this may be it. Not a pleasant thought.
 
Our bodies has been in a fight with bacteria since the beginning of time. Nothing new here. The most dangerous place to pick up resistant bacteria is the hospital.

Remember kids, when you're prescribed a certain amount of antibiotics, take them all or else you're basically creating drug resistant bacteria. If you're killing them, kill them all

Sent from my tablet using my paws
 
While the article does touch on an alarming topic, the fear mongering is a bit much.

The idea that EVERYTHING develops antibiotic resistance is a bit too far fetched.

In the end, This planet went from 2.5B to 6Bil in 50 years....An adjustment HAS to be made.
 
Don't forget improper/inadequate use of antibiotics, especially in developing countries.

The recommended use is usually x number of days, usually a little more than a week. Here in Canada if you are prescribed antibiotics the pharmacist will fill it for the full amount. By the time you finish your prescription, you will have killed all the bacteria you were infected with.

In other places, they'll fill it for a few days then tell you to come back for the rest. By then, the majority of the bacteria that was susceptible to the antibiotic has died, the person feels better, and decides they don't want to spend money on the rest of it. So they don't go.

Or, if they got more than just a few days' worth, they use it until they feel better, then sell whatever they didn't use to the next person who gets sick.

But wait now, those two or three days of antibiotics didn't kill all the bacteria; just the weakest ones. The ones that are left are the drug-resistant ones, now left free to breed.

Survival of the fittest, bam.
 
The world is overpopulated with humans. But nature always acts to put things back into balance. Something's got to give, and this may be it. Not a pleasant thought.

Bacteria & viruses have evolved with our immune system since the dawn of time. When a new disease pops up eg swine flu, it just means they won.

Overpopulation simply means diseases are easier to spread. More congestion
 
Just want to mention that there have been bacteria which were resistant to all antibiotics available on the market at the time since about the 60's. Which is only 30 years after the introduction of antibiotics.

Fortunately, it's easier to kill bacteria than it is to kill viruses. Doesn't mean it's easy, but if everyone starts dropping dead from some nasty drug resistant stuff, any new development will be simpler than say, the efforts to come up with an aids vaccine.

It's essentially an arms race forever. That article's not technically wrong, but it's also pretty fearmongering.
 
As I always say, if they paid scientists the same amount of $$ as they paid athletes, I'm sure there will be a cure for cancer

Sent from my tablet using my paws
 
While the article does touch on an alarming topic, the fear mongering is a bit much.

The idea that EVERYTHING develops antibiotic resistance is a bit too far fetched.

In the end, This planet went from 2.5B to 6Bil in 50 years....An adjustment HAS to be made.
The human population is ready for a large cull, that's for sure. Way too many of us.
 
As I always say, if they paid scientists the same amount of $$ as they paid athletes, I'm sure there will be a cure for cancer

Sent from my tablet using my paws

Cure for cancer? Do you have any idea what it costs to treat cancer patients?

There is no money in a cure, its in treatment...
 
A cure for cancer is going to happen like a car that doesn't break down and can last 5 million km. Never.

Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
 
Cure for cancer? Do you have any idea what it costs to treat cancer patients?

There is no money in a cure, its in treatment...

So is any other disease

Sent from my tablet using my paws
 
We'll cure cancer the day we can figure out how to prevent mutations in every cell in a human body.

Which is to say, ain't gonna happen. Might get better treatments though.
 
Back
Top Bottom