**They WON'T insure your bike without insuring a home, and bringing your car is not enough**
A friend of mine called for a quote on his bike which is not even a SS, it's a naked sport-tourer like the SV-650. He was told by the agent that he would not insure him without him insuring a condo or a house with them because naked sport-tourers were "dangerous", WTF? My friend offered to bring his car and the agent adamantly said "No". He asked the reason why they insure SS without problems yet not sport-tourers and he was told sport-tourers are more dangerous. Hahaha yeah right. Holy hell talk about retardeness, how is insuring a house going to help in reducing the chances of crashing with a bike? Doesn't your clean record reflect that?
How many of you actually insured your super-sports alone with them without anything else? Or how many of you have ever insured a sport-tourer with them without home insurance?
A friend of mine called for a quote on his bike which is not even a SS, it's a naked sport-tourer like the SV-650. He was told by the agent that he would not insure him without him insuring a condo or a house with them because naked sport-tourers were "dangerous", WTF? My friend offered to bring his car and the agent adamantly said "No". He asked the reason why they insure SS without problems yet not sport-tourers and he was told sport-tourers are more dangerous. Hahaha yeah right. Holy hell talk about retardeness, how is insuring a house going to help in reducing the chances of crashing with a bike? Doesn't your clean record reflect that?
How many of you actually insured your super-sports alone with them without anything else? Or how many of you have ever insured a sport-tourer with them without home insurance?
Last edited: