mmmm vag
yeah it is an average looking SUV, quality should be good though
at least for the first 150,000....after that you don't wanna be the guy paying the repair bills
typical german product, repair costs will be nasty
Hardly.... Ive owned 2 VW's and loved both of them. My 91 jetta I put 312000 on and the only problem I had was the oil pump failed because I was driving it like a 911 race car. My 2003 1.8T Jetta wagon had 255000 on when I traded it in. I had no problems with it at all.
Not quite. Some estimates say 40, others say 100+ premature deaths in the US from 2009-2015 due to dieselgate.What debacle? The cars made MORE power and they cheated the testing machines.
Did they KILL anyone, NO but they had fines WAY MORE than GM that KILLED people? Go figure that one out.
VW is smart, they will offer some solid cars to attract new and previous VW owners.
Toyota cars KILLED people...they seem to be doing just fine.
Interesting how a major hissy fit is thrown because they cheated emissions testing BUT the car companies that made AND KNEW about their cars KILLING people...gets treated with less hostility/intensity.
The planes that the EPA staff flies around on pollutes more than all those VW cars combined in 1 year.
Not quite. Some estimates say 40, others say 100+ premature deaths in the US from 2009-2015 due to dieselgate.
http://www.sciencealert.com/scienti...-of-the-volkswagen-emissions-cheating-scandal
The difference with GM is the VW cars were intentionally designed with full knowledge that it would cause these extra deaths. You can decide which is worse based on the correct info, but the point is emissions rules aren't invented just for funsies.
That's not how actuarial analysis works. The number of people that died from something that COULD be related to pollution is in the millions. The number of lives lost that can probably be apportioned to the increased pollution from VW is many dozens (a wide error margin, granted). The point is it's not zero. The main reason NOx pollution is bad is that it kills people. Of course it's not easily observable cause-effect like a knife in the heart, but the effect is real, and dead is still dead.If you follow those links, they list strokes and heart attacks as some of the causes related to the pollution deaths with the majority in India and China. When they "estimate" 106 people "killed" in the US over a 6 year span, that hardly worries me since there is no direct way to link VW diesels to those deaths aside from: they pollute a bit more, therefore anyone that died from something that COULD be related to pollution was VW's fault. More pollution is always bad but I'd wager that a vehicle actually killing or maiming someone is worse.
You also don't think someone at GM knew along the lines that the ignition switch was faulty but higher ups just ran with it? Yes, VW scammed the system but to say they were actively killing people is a stretch.
Besides, we need some more population control on this planet.
That's not how actuarial analysis works. The number of people that died from something that COULD be related to pollution is in the millions. The number of lives lost that can probably be apportioned to the increased pollution from VW is many dozens (a wide error margin, granted). The point is it's not zero. The main reason NOx pollution is bad is that it kills people. Of course it's not easily observable cause-effect like a knife in the heart, but the effect is real, and dead is still dead.
Again, you can make your own judgements about who was worse but at least use the correct info.
Because of the price of gas in the U.K. there's a lot of people love their diesel VWs there. My sister is one of them and she doesn't want to take it in to get it adjusted. Lots of other owners don't want to either.
So by that logic then, anyone who has tuned their truck to roll coal should be up on manslaughter charges.