Everyone should read the first article, at 327 pages, the second one is a novel, not an article. I genuinely wish this could be updated to include the newer SNELL certifications though. Anyone know if they've lowered the G tolerances since 2005?
Everyone should read the first article, at 327 pages, the second one is a novel, not an article. I genuinely wish this could be updated to include the newer SNELL certifications though. Anyone know if they've lowered the G tolerances since 2005?
With ECE 22.06 ( and FRHPhe-01 for elite competition) seeming to take precedence world wide it seems fewer and fewer manufacturers care much about Snell.
Everyone should read the first article, at 327 pages, the second one is a novel, not an article. I genuinely wish this could be updated to include the newer SNELL certifications though. Anyone know if they've lowered the G tolerances since 2005?
The first article is getting to be pretty old. If I remember right, it wasn't received favourably at all by the Snell Foundation, but Snell ended up making some changes in subsequent versions of this standard. It's still a double-impact test - even for 2025 ... looked for, and spotted, that requirement still in there. There's a chart of how much each head-form is supposed to weigh, so perhaps they clued in that a smaller head weighs less and warrants more cushioning.
Quick scan of the 2025 document linked to above, indicates a 275 G limit but it's not quite so simple, there's a chart with some differing (slightly lower) numbers in there. I did not attempt to figure out which table entry is for what, but I've seen enough. Since that original Motorcyclist article, I have bought only ECE 22.05 helmets. Based on what I just read of the new 2025 Snell specification, going forward I will only buy ECE 22.06 or FIM helmets.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.