Salos, I think you'll find that the statute of limitations has expired!
This is considered a fatal flaw. What does it say under did commit the offence of? Try and find that EXACT thing int he HTA.... You will not be able to, and as such, without the section the charge does not exist. The crown would NOT be able to convict on that fact. Also, the fact that the section number is missing prevents you from answering the charge against you. This infringes on your section 7 charter rights. My advice. Don't request disclosure. Show up for trial, and BEFORE you plead, say to the JP. I would like to bring forth a motion before the court that the charge against me be quashed as the offence bears a fatal flaw on it's face. You will be asked to point out that flaw. Tell them there is no section number on the offence notice, and that the charge does not exist as written on the ticket, in the HTA.
If they don't throw it out based on that. Then just proceed.
You then have grounds for appeal on two grounds
1. You were unable to answer to the charge against you as you were not informed of that charge.
2. You were unable to make a proper defence to the charge since no charge was listed, you were unable to seek proper disclosure.
Hope this helps.
By failing to put in the section number the offence notice is not citing the HTA.... for example is the ticket says speeding 120kmh in a posted 100 zone, I would task you with trying to find that anywhere in the HTA... the offence does not exist. The cop MUST fill it in for the offence notice to be complete. You are charged with a SECTION of the HTA, not the words the officer writes. The JP does NOT edit the offence notice, only the crown can, and this would cause you undue hardship as the error was clearly on the officer's and crown's part.
Yes, it is a legitimate defense. I have used it, and won with it on several occasions.