Got to ride a 2019 MT09 today, here are my thoughts on it
Background
Took the MT09 for about 40 mins from Apex at Yamaha’s demo day, did some minor twisties/roundabouts.
Chassis & Handling
I think the best way to describe the MT feel, especially at low speeds, is like a bicycle. The wide bars are super comfortable and give you tons of leverage to maneuver around. It weighs about the same as the R6 but since it’s an inline 3, it is quite a bit narrower. In contrast to the XSR900, the tank tapers down along the inside leg which helps to not only make the bike hide it’s true weight/size but also give the rider a much more planted feel. The riding position is very upright for excellent comfort and visibility. Seat height is quite unforgiving to vertically challenged riders like myself; luckily the narrow seat allows one to easily slide off a cheek and flat foot the bike when coming to a full stop.
If I had one word to describe how it feels out on the road, it would be planted. The 180/55 rear tire provides excellent stability and contact patch while retaining the light flick able characteristics. Swerving and moving around the bike at 80kmh is effortless largely thanks to the massive leverage one has on the bars. The tapered tank provides excellent grip and positioning on the inside leg for the goons that like to hang off their bikes.
Suspension is a huge talking point; the 2017+ received a major update compared to the previous FZ badged bikes. This update brought along a slightly stiffer rear shock and more importantly, adjustable forks. To me, this is really bizarre; the rear shock felt incredibly plush and the travel was massive. I can’t imagine an even more plush unit that the FZ would have had; likely because I’m coming from the R6 which has a wooden plank for a seat and stupidly firm shock. Going over bumps and rough pavement was super smooth, the seat padding helped with that tremendously as well. So how did it feel at higher speeds/cornering? Not bad. Not bad at all. I think a lot of people equate soft suspension with poor handling which is not necessarily the case. It felt planted in corners and I felt confident in all parts of the curve. Corner exit was bizarre as getting on the power compresses the shock even more and there’s a slight delay. It’s not an SS however, and if that’s where you set your expectations, then you will be disappointed. You are trying to make the bike something its not.
Engine/Transmission/Electronics
The inline 3 is also very smooth, no complaints here. Supposedly the FZ had jerky throttle issues; the MT had no issues with that. Throttle tube travel is much too long for my liking but that’s an easy fix. The torque on the motor is fantastic as is the sound. Even high gear, low rpm, the bike pulls like mad. I described the bikes handling as planted earlier on; that all goes out the window when you ring its neck. The front end gets super light when getting on the gas and you have to have some experience to keep it controlled. It’ll power wheelie easily in second; sneezing in first will result in you looping the bike. Top end also seems quite good but it is definitely not where the bike excels at. This was a Yamaha sanctioned demo ride, so didn’t get to test this aspect much.
I would say a quick shifter is an absolute must and am a little disappointed that Yamaha doesn’t include it as standard. After riding with one for quite a while now, riding a bike without one is just lame. Let the peasants use the clutch; I want to stay on the power and shift seamlessly!
Unlike the R1, I got to play around with the electronics a little. The bike essentially has 3 features which keeps things simple; ABS, TCS and power modes. Starting with ABS, it’s something I would disable right away. I tried locking the rear and sure enough, the unit did its job and prevented lock up. However, that takes some fun out of it for me; I like playing around with that kind of stuff. With the tires available today and with a somewhat experienced rider, I definitely don’t think ABS is a necessity. Learn proper braking technique and you’ll be better off. TCS comes in 3 settings; off, 1, 2 with 2 being most aggressive. Clutching it up in second gear with TCS on 1 was relatively easy but it does cut power and makes it awkward to modulate. 1 wheel shenanigans aside, the TCS works really well and I saw the TCS strobe a few times coming out of corners or even 2nd gear roll ons. Power modes supposedly change the throttle mapping; I didn’t play with it too much and left it on standard. Mode A felt more snappy but it’s more of a gimmick in my mind. I would have preferred A to be an eco-mode button for instance.
Brakes
Like the R6, the MT has radially mounted calipers which have excellent bite and braking is smooth and predictable/stable. Nose dive is pretty severe but that could potentially be tuned out in the way of suspension settings.
Verdict (and why I will likely be picking up the MT sometime soon)
The MT is exactly what I am looking for in a road bike; very comfortable, gobs of torque and power and great handling characteristics. Its 10k price tag is also quite appealing and you get a ton of value for your money. If I am going to have 2 bikes; I might as well get 2 different classes. The top end and high speed smoothness wont come close to an SS; and expecting that is setting yourself up for disappointment. You have to understand what this bike is and not try to make it something else. Being a naked style bike, wind protection is minimal. Going 120kmh feels fast, vs on the R1 where 200kmh felt like putting around. It just seems like a more sensible street bike decision.
That about sums up my thoughts on the MT and why I’ll be picking one up. Once I put some nice sticky Q3’s on it, it will be a very fun, fast bike
I’m undecided on new vs used; used ones on Kijiji are posted for 9k or I can spend 10k and get a new one from the dealer. I’ll likely be picking one up sometime in September/October!