Having a video feeds a greater audience. Media doesn't have outrage, or any emotion (except for Nancy Grace who ONLY has outrage), but we have morbid curiosity and that feeds them.A lot of "Hollywood" people, "Hollywood" commentators and general media are outraged by this. Where is there outrage when one of their prized directors is a child molester, where is there outrage when one of their own is caught drunk driving, etc, etc, etc.?
Not in anyway saying this guy is right, just pointing out an inconsistency in how the media looks at people or events (physical abuse vs sexual, athlete vs celebrity, or is it race vs race--I do not know). I just know where there is outrage vs very little to none.
Last edited: