Love my RSR2. Pity the new Sharks fit different than the RSR2 beacause they don't fit my head anymore ![Frown :( :(](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png)
![Frown :( :(](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png)
Love my RSR2. Pity the new Sharks fit different than the RSR2 beacause they don't fit my head anymore![]()
I'll never buy a Shark, a member's lid after a spill:
![]()
What makes you think another helmet would perform better?
If no two collisions are the same why the fuss over standardized testing?
Don't think it's fair to judge a whole brand because of the results of one terrible accident. No two collisions are the exact same, it's hard to predict what should have happened.
If no two collisions are the same why the fuss over standardized testing?
As a method of assuring that a helmet can provide at least some protection. No helmet, or any safety device for that matter, can ensure safety in every conceivable situation, which explains what happened to that Shark bin. But some protection is always better than none.
A different helmet, one that didn't break at the chin, might have saved his face and/or might have left him a quadriplegic. Who are we to say based on one incident? After all, aren't helmets supposed to get destroyed in an impact?
I guess you may never really know, it's just that the helmet in the picture left a very negative image in my mind and I would never buy one after seeing that.
I just never heard/saw any other helmet end up looking like that after a crash.
Yup, seems like **** happens even with the best of them.Did you see that arai?