I don't know if citing them would help. Any source that implies "lie detector" tests are definitive is probably ****.
It is a polygraph, and it is only slightly more accurate than an uneducated guess.
I googled the first one since thats my area of expertise. I found that almost every site that referred to it had (conspiracy) in the title and nothing from any legitimate sources.
If you think that the SEC is some kind of government lapdog. You have no idea what the SEC is.
If there really was an increase in trading volumes, it can be found in the historical information of the NYSE. The fact that the most direct source of info is not cited or even referred to is lolerskates.
Unless of course you think you have lots to teach me about securities commissions. In that case you are clearly delusional.
And then there is this one:
"Data recovery experts later looking at 32 hard drives salvaged from the 9/11 attacks discover a surge in credit card transactions from the WTC in the hours before and during the attacks. Unusually large sums of money are rushed through computers even as the disaster unfolds. Investigators later say, “There is a suspicion that some people had advance knowledge of the approximate time of the plane crashes in order to move out amounts exceeding $100 million. They thought that the records of their transactions could not be traced after the mainframes were destroyed.”
To anyone that actually believes that.... I ask... do you know how electronic banking works? Its the WTC, its not a bunch of guys working at Mcdonalds who didn't graduate from high school.
BTW. 100 million is pocket change to the amount of money that moves though the planet every single day.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
