My bad miss communication...
As i said end-user price caps need to be in place.
Perhaps kick backs?
As i said end-user price caps need to be in place.
Perhaps kick backs?
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought the 407 deal was a 99 year lease. The other part of that screw-up is some of the clauses. The government can't do anything that would affect profit, ie control rates or permit another highway.
If the 407 consortium can charge what it wants why would the government lease off that cash cow instead of keeping the money for itself?
My bad miss communication...
As i said end-user price caps need to be in place.
Perhaps kick backs?
rise in traffic is not dependent on 407 increases.. every year we have more and more cars on the road.. as long as people are willing to pay to circumvent 401/404/400 etc this trend will continue which means... hikes...
Which is never cause population keeps increasing. Along with drivers on the road...they dont even have to expand... just avoid congestionThat's right - if we are willing to pay and traffic counts keep rising as a result of our willingness to pay to avoid congestion, and 407 can keep growing capacity to minimize congestion, 407 can keep increasing rates until they hit that equilibrium point.
The Ontario Energy Board would still remain in place along with substantial Ontario government ownership in the distribution system. If private enterprise can do the job more efficiently and react to changes in technology and needs than government can (and they often can), privatization might be a good thing.
The Queens Park mafia are clever enough to realize if they sell the farm, they don't have to work on the farm. But there will be fat salaries and travel and dinners for appointies to the Energy Board, they will make important decisions for Ontario power and offer guidance for the private sector managers, things like which wine goes with a shrimp cocktail.....The Ontario Energy Board would still remain in place along with substantial Ontario government ownership in the distribution system. If private enterprise can do the job more efficiently and react to changes in technology and needs than government can (and they often can), privatization might be a good thing.
Not to derail the discussion....
But with the discussion around the 407
I was just down in NY for the weekend, interesting comparison on tolls. Buffalo to Albany on the I-90 cost me $12.85 (~$16 CDN equivalent) for 270 miles (435 kms)
The 407 doesn't cover the same distance, max distance is 107 kms that would cost you, non peak $28.52
if I did the same distance from the I-90 on the 407, my bill would be about $114. Complete rip off...
Anyone mention that as soon as 1 share is sold publicly there is no more oversight?
http://www.torontosun.com/2015/03/11/privatizing-hydro-one-risks-losing-oversight
Private companies over bill all the time, look at the cable and phone companies. I think bell even went to court to ***** about getting caught.There may not be a need for oversight if its run by people that understand business. Hydro one overbilling , bullying and outright lies to customers would most likely not occur in a different business model.
The idea that Ontario Hydro had to be rebranded Hydro One, as provincial business, and the rebranding cost millions, and they pay for advertising at places like Rogers center?? you'll buy electric power where else?? The place has been run by a goof troop. SELL IT.
I love that conservatives who have been going on about the need to privatize Hydro & LCBO for ages are now treating privatization as a crazy idea by a mad premiere.
I'm not a fan of privatization but Hydro has been run so poorly for so many years that I have to think someone can do a better job running it.
On the other hand I think the LCBO is functioning just fine as a money making enterprise that I hope we keep it public and make money.
Hydro is so entrenched in it's own BS that the only way we could keep it and fix it would mean contracting out. I'm sure the unions will accept that without a fight. (Not)
They'll tighten up that contract so much that they'll get blamed by the new owners for causing rates to go up because 'Look at the salaries we need to pay!' will be a great excuse.
P.S. I'm jealous of their salaries and jobs FYI
I love that conservatives who have been going on about the need to privatize Hydro & LCBO for ages are now treating privatization as a crazy idea by a mad premiere.
I'm not a fan of privatization but Hydro has been run so poorly for so many years that I have to think someone can do a better job running it.
On the other hand I think the LCBO is functioning just fine as a money making enterprise that I hope we keep it public and make money.