say it aint so, elmo

Status
Not open for further replies.
hi-elmo-kevin-clash-8col.png
 
holy smokes, this is wrong no matter what way you look at it..

first thing, he's not denying that he had a relationship with a young kid.

so now we have a gay puppeteer, who enjoys "young " boys working for sesame street.

dude was in a relationship with a 16 yr old kid while he was 45.



http://www.torontosun.com/2012/11/12/elmo-star-accused-of-sex-with-teen-boy

I'm shocked on how little attention this is getting, meanwhile church sex scandals are front and centre. **** you liberal media!
 
There's that thing with that guy from the BBC too that's recently blown up.... he'd been molesting kids for decades... I forget his name.
 
There's that thing with that guy from the BBC too that's recently blown up.... he'd been molesting kids for decades... I forget his name.

Jimmy Savile, but the allegations didn't come out until a year after he died. Since then the BBC has been one big cluster ****. To give you some perspective on just how big this is for the BBC, imagine if Don Cherry passed away, and a year later it comes out he was raping young hockey players...That's pretty much the scope of what happened in BBCland.
 
I never get it. They're turned-on by young boys...

How??

Sent from my phone using my paws
 
Not just the BBC, the entire country.

Pretty much common knowledge that Saville was a diddler, but no-one came forward(or was scared to) while the bugger was still alive.

I'm almost to the point where anyone i see involved working with Children i now automatically suspect as a pedo.


Sad really...
 
Not that I'm condoning this, but having a relationship with a 16 year-old isn't quite the same as molesting a young boy.

How many of you cheer on the idea of an older female teacher getting it on with an adolescent male student? Every teenage boy's fantasy, right?
 
Not that I'm condoning this, but having a relationship with a 16 year-old isn't quite the same as molesting a young boy.

How many of you cheer on the idea of an older female teacher getting it on with an adolescent male student? Every teenage boy's fantasy, right?

Teacher no, Prom Queen Yes.
 
Not that I'm condoning this, but having a relationship with a 16 year-old isn't quite the same as molesting a young boy.

How many of you cheer on the idea of an older female teacher getting it on with an adolescent male student? Every teenage boy's fantasy, right?

Also, the reason this isn't getting that much attention is that nothing has been proven yet. It sounds like their relationship was ongoing and who knows if it started before the dude turned 18 or not. If both of them are gay and the other guy was 18 when they first had sex than no laws were broken. Even at 16 years old, depending on state laws, maybe no laws were broken.
 
Hey, Courtney Stodden was 16 when she married that dude from the X-Files (in his 50's). Icky as all hell, but apparently legal..

293.stodden7.lc.071311.jpg
 
Hey, Courtney Stodden was 16 when she married that dude from the X-Files (in his 50's). Icky as all hell, but apparently legal..

293.stodden7.lc.071311.jpg

Wasnt he in the Green Mile?
Loved that character

Sent from my tablet using my paws
 
Not that I'm condoning this, but having a relationship with a 16 year-old isn't quite the same as molesting a young boy.

This x10000

I guess I'm a little biased becuase my current boyfriend is 16 (17 in a few weeks.) And before anyone starts yelling at me about morals, I'm only 19 myself so there's a very small age gap (2 years.)
 
A better question to ask, How do these psychopaths get through the system to be in such positions of authority over kids?

Just say "I'm doing it for the children"

Do you get barely legal porn?

That's not my thing. Most of my fav porn starts are over 21 for some reason. In fact if they don't have makeup to make them more mature, I can't fap off :(
 
This is how it stands in Canada:

http://www.satcontario.com/en/about_sa_violence-child.php

"Child sexual abuse occurs when a child under the age of 16 is used for sexual purposes by an adult or adolescent"

It doesn't matter if it was consensual, under 16 cannot legally "consent". This guy could have been off by a few months when it started out. The guy could have been almost 16, but if he wasn't 16 when it first started, he was sexually abused because he doesn't have the capacity, according to law, to "consent".

Say whatever you want, the CCC says otherwise if the child is under 16. And the courts will countdown to the day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom