sburns
Well-known member
What the hell is that.. where is all the chrome!!This was the perfect HD for me. Wheelie fun!
What the hell is that.. where is all the chrome!!This was the perfect HD for me. Wheelie fun!
Been thinking about cruisers as well lately, my thoughts on the subject are:
Harleys are overpriced.
if the there is no discernible difference between a metric cruiser and a harley in terms of the performance, feel, functionality, and the only thing different about the two is marketing speak and a brand, id go metric every time.
I'd consider Harley's expensive but not overpriced. They sell easy and hold resale value really well so if you can swing the initial purchase price they aren't bad to own at all. If a metric does it for you then yeah absolutely save the money.
What the hell is that.. where is all the chrome!!
Where is the argument?Nope. a Harley is a Harley - but you're generalizing all Harleys across the board based on the smallest one. Decide what you're trying to argue here. Your thread is to Harley riders. Rename it so you can belittle the correct owners.
Same as saying to all the Yamaha riders, why is the C3 so slow.
I've owned a sportster in my time. It was fun as hell for the riding and customizing I did. I didn't expect it to be more than it was.
I can meet you halfway.If people are willing to write the cheque it's tough to consider something overpriced. Expensive sure but all premium products are expensive.
Get back when? If you bought a used harley and sold it a few years later my suspicion is that it would have less depreciation than an equivalent metric cruiser. Yes, you had more money tied up so there was some opportunity cost but if you ignore that, the harley may actually be cheaper to have in your garage.I can meet you halfway.
Perhaps you don't have an issue cutting a cheque at that price point but what if i did? As long as people base the decision on what they get back for the money then it could certainly be considered overpriced.
This.If you strictly look at the vehicle stats (hp,weight, etc.) I think harley is overpriced. I don't think many people would argue though that much of their (HD) value is tied up in the sound and image.
i mean, what's the problem with "high" kms on a bike? probably a good thing if you`re trying to dodge lemons.I'd be all for used HDs, but I have no any idea what harley powertrain reliablity is like.
Any harley I would consider reasonably priced probably has high kms, and I dont want to get stuck with a lemon
I'd be all for used HDs, but I have no any idea what harley powertrain reliablity is like.
On a japanese bike? nothing.i mean, what's the problem with "high" kms on a bike? probably a good thing if you`re trying to dodge lemons.
I'd be all for used HDs, but I have no any idea what harley powertrain reliablity is like.
Any harley I would consider reasonably priced probably has high kms, and I dont want to get stuck with a lemon
Don't start looking for pall bearers, HD is far from trouble. The stock price isn't a great indicator right now, there has been a lot of fear mongering around HOG, and some additional uncertainty over America's trade disputes. HD is exceeding expectations and they continue to be a sound financial performer, meaning they are tending to business and shareholder needs while working on market solutions.Yesterday's technology at tomorrow's prices.
Harley doesn't sell motorcycles, they sell a brand image, which is a double edged sword. While not a novel concept by any extent, they spent years appealing to counter culture and nostalgia of the boom generation who were adamant on demonstrating they were 'different than their parents'. Rebellion, freedom, the list goes on. Once sufficiently affluent the generation that went through the largest wealth expansions in human history had the means to fulfil their dreams of youth and live the dreams of years past. Dentist by day, rebel by weekend. Harley capitalized. That time has since passed however and every generation goes through this cycle. As the golden generation ages out of the market that same cycle repeats. The net outcome is of course the polar opposite as it was once before, where Harley does not reflect the values of the next generation, for the same reason: 'We are different'. Big, loud, inefficient, expensive, blind brand loyalty is no longer a desirable attribute. The livewire, while an admirable attempt, will ultimately not be successful. A necessary cost, however, to try and stem the bleeding by conveying an image the brand is modernizing. 'We are not your parents motorcycle'. As they've now discovered, the problem with resting on your laurels because 'that's the way we've always done it' is the scariest phrase in any business. You can only sell the 'classic' so many times. Unfortunately this went on too long and now the bill for the pent up technical debt has arrived. Why invest profit in R&D, when we can reduce SG&A and pump margins. Now we see the other side of the coin. A stale product line that doesn't appeal to a changing market, with a brand image that no longer resonates with the upcoming buyers, regardless of the R&D effort now being spent late in the game. Whether you agree or disagree, money is indifferent, brick and motor factories sit collecting dust, and balance sheets don't lie. Can they turn it around? I hope so, more riders is good for the entire community, but it's hard to see how at the moment.
View attachment 40303
^ agree with this
for a lot of immigrants that have worked hard and done well
a Harley is a popular status symbol
look at the Sikh riders that gained the helmet exemption
don't see any of them of 250/300 Jap bikes or SS
same applies in developing countries with huge emerging middle class
ask any Indian rider what he would rather have
a Royal Enfield or a HD
when they get to the point in life to afford it, they will get the Harley