For a charge as serious as 172. I personally wouldn't even bother with a paralegal, (they generally will be "happy" to take a deal to get you a speeding conviction). That will still negatively affect you going forward. Personally I would go with a lawyer, who will work to actually get you a not guilty decision.
Now let me educate you a bit. Firstly, you don't speak to the JP at a first appearance, (unless your pleading guilty outright). You speak to the crown. If you begin the convesation as you laid it out here.. I did it BUT...I haven't been in trouble before, I need my car, I have big student debt, etc etc etc. The crown is unlikely to offer any sort of real reduction. Why would they? You have already admitted you did it. Speaking to the officer, isn't likley to go well either. If she/he were going to cut you a break they would have done roadside.
It is also highly dependent where you were when you got tagged. Some forces/detachments, (if it was rural area it could have been OPP), have a zero tolerance policy for 172 charges meaning if your in that territory the supervisor expect the officer to lay the charge.
Throwing yourself to the "mercy of the court" (Lienency) is at best a crap shoot. There are just too many variables, (the cop/crown/JP) had a fight with their partner the night before and you pay for it. The JP/crown/cop wants to make an "example" of you. you get the idea.
You can not just look at the "costs" of the conviction, (impound fees, which you won't recover even if found not guilty), the fine, MTO points, suspension of your drivers licence. You have to consider the increased insurance costs for a considerable length of time. It is VERY possible your current insurer will drop you as soon as they see the conviction. Then you will have to go into the facility insurance market, where your rates will likely double if not triple. If you ride a bike you can forget about that as well as the insurance will be unaffordable for most.
A lawyer will cost you but not nearly as much as losing will.
+1. Listen to this guy.
I have gone through the same thing.
GET A LAWYER! NOT paralegal. this is SERIOUS!!!
Im not gonna get into how unjust HTA172 is. ill paint you a picture of guilty vs. lawyer getting you free of the charge
Guilty equals:
license suspension. Insurance will drop you. You will have to pay $5-7K per year insurance at facility for 3-6 years.
You can and will most likely be hit with an added fine $2000-$10 0000 FINE upon being found guilty
Also automatic license suspension.
And for the rest of your life every time you get pulled over, or go to fight a ticket and lose, this will be on your record, will be weighed against you, and you will keep paying the price for the rest of your life.
Paralegals are not qualified to fight something of this magnitude. they lose a 20 over ticket not a big deal, but THIS is Huge, ruins your life.
You need a lawyer, and let me tell you, it is well worth spending the money to have a qualified individual fight for you. the Prosecutor will go after you hard, and will want to nail you. If i had a do over with my charge, i would happily have spend $10k on a lawyer, now mind you that doesn't mean how much it will cost you, just saying having the seen the aftermath i'd happily spend even that much to get a lawyer to fight a charge like this.
Good luck. i hope you win this.
and I hope this HTA172 BS law gets abolished.... then again Wynn is introducing a whole new can of worms where we won't even be able to fight our tickets anymore... hate Ontario.