Well, the cager's idea worked, the second bike didn't pass him in a no pass zone. It just could have been better executed.
where was this no pass zone?
Someone is once again confused that double yellows mean no passing. (At least in Ontario, it's not.) Could be different in this particular state.
What's not confused is that someone objected to a particular road being used as a test track even though the method used to express that objection was a fail.
This seldom happens around here. The locals have instead mastered the fine art of pea gravel in strategic locations.
really? can u show me anywhere that they were even speeding?
What's not confused is that someone objected to a particular road being used as a test track even though the method used to express that objection was a fail.
you're kidding, right?really? can u show me anywhere that they were even speeding?
I hate to say this, but Turbodish is right on this one.
I think what he was getting at is that nowhere in the video did we see any speed readings.
A video can eaasily be altered to run in fast-forward or slow-motion to create the illusion of faster speeds.
Hollywood does it all the time.
I agree that the speeding was quite obvious as long as the video is in a unedited form, but there is no proof.
which you fully condone, im sure. Never mind that it could take out responsible riders as well on corners, but you dont ride a bike so what difference does it make.
I think what he was getting at is that nowhere in the video did we see any speed readings.
A video can eaasily be altered to run in fast-forward or slow-motion to create the illusion of faster speeds.
Hollywood does it all the time.
I agree that the speeding was quite obvious as long as the video is in a unedited form, but there is no proof.