It says Intact in the image.which insurer?
Sent from the moon!
Good catch! Missed that. The quote I got from them was terrible.It says Intact in the image.
What were you quoted? Im curious to know, and how old are you?Good catch! Missed that. The quote I got from them was terrible.
I was quoted $2841 libility only. No bundle. Exact quote from 2 different brokers dealing with Intact. Mid 40's, Harley, Scarborough, 2 years Riding. Some of those are negative factors but this quote was $1092 more then I was paying previously. I have found better quotes but still shopping around.What were you quoted? Im curious to know, and how old are you?
I phoned around every year to get a lower premium than Intact, even called my vehicle insurer Desjardins, and nobody gave me a lower price so with Intact Im staying.
Wow, what's the displacement on your Harley ? 2841 is insane. 1k more than what I was paying for full coverage on a liter SS.I was quoted $2841 libility only. No bundle. Exact quote from 2 different brokers dealing with Intact. Mid 40's, Harley, Scarborough, 2 years Riding. Some of those are negative factors but this quote was $1092 more then I was paying previously. I have found better quotes but still shopping around.
'sWow, what's the displacement on your Harley ? 2841 is insane. 1k more than what I was paying for full coverage on a liter SS.
Hmm surprised. Given your age + 2 years licensed + M (right?) ... Thats too expensive for a cruiser, even if it's 1700cc. Could it be that particular cruiser for whatever reason ? Have you tried pricing something similar just to see if there's a difference ?'s
Yes it is.
1690 it's a cruiser.
Before I bought the bike I priced out Mid Cruiser's 650cc's etc and they were only $200 less so why not go up.
Well hopefully next year things improve as it will be my 3rd year. One can hope.
Oh I agree it's expensive no doubt. Before I got my bike I priced out several models and engine sizes. The middle cruisers were only $200 less then what I am paying for 1690cc's so why not. I am homing when I have completed 3 years experience something might happen. This seems lik a barrier for the insurers for some reason as a few of them have mentioned this number.Hmm surprised. Given your age + 2 years licensed + M (right?) ... Thats too expensive for a cruiser, even if it's 1700cc. Could it be that particular cruiser for whatever reason ? Have you tried pricing something similar just to see if there's a difference ?
I was quoted $2841 libility only. No bundle. Exact quote from 2 different brokers dealing with Intact. Mid 40's, Harley, Scarborough, 2 years Riding. Some of those are negative factors but this quote was $1092 more then I was paying previously. I have found better quotes but still shopping around.
Nope fully clean record, no tickets, accidents, not even a parking ticket. Insurance is rigged. Once they know you will pay a higher amount I believe they just keep you there.That's f*cked. That much?? I know a guy here 10 years younger than you, with less experience, with a supersport paying only $1800/yr. You must have tickets or accidents in your record.
Age?My DRZ went $1200, to $9xx, to $490. Three years in a row.
Age?
And your username would seemingly indicate that you're from the KW area, so your rates are always gonna be in the realm of "fantasy land" for the rest of us in the GTA (specifically Peel and Markham region)
with who?Mid 20's, and you are correct, didn't mean it for comparison just another happy tale of insurance dropping a lot.