Most certainly he is over 30yo.
My disappointing exprience with Meloche Monnex(MM)
- Thread starter bombart
- Start date
Most certainly he is over 30yo.
EngineerJoe
Well-known member
My insurance company is aware of the mods. And the vehicle is street legal. Again, if you can find a link that references NHTSA, CFR, FMVSS or CMVSS, please share.
As far as the website you listed, Ontario wasn't listed. Most states that have bumper height laws allow some variation with bumper height change (between 3" and 8")... the others don't have bumper height laws.
That's what I'm thinking... I'm at $1,200 Full...with SF...but 26...
I know if I bring my car over it will be cheaper...but SF car rates SUCKS!
Tried doing the online qoute with MM...3k...
When I insured my 125 with SF they actually had 'supersport' on the insurance documentation...I almost died laughing when I saw that!
yup, I'm 38 with a perfect record (knock on wood lol), married, house, kid, etc... It helped alot too that MM had alumni deals from my university.. damn lucky to be paying so low..
Ninjitsu
Well-known member
Where do fender eliminators fall in this? Does everyone with a fender eliminator kit, unknown to their insurance company, risk being denied coverage?
EngineerJoe
Well-known member
Best to talk to your insurance company. The mod is purely aesthetic (9 times out of 10), but so are stickers (which is a modification that some insurance companies frown upon).
The thing to remember is disclosure. Just mention what you have done or plan to do and it's generally accepted. Why give the insurance company a reason to hassle you in the event of a claim?
Your rate is low because you're over 30 and have a perfect record (and you probably also have your car with MM which will get you a discount on your bike). The house, marriage, and kid do nothing to lower your bike rate (although the house will lower the car rate that you pay).
I would be very surprised if any company would deny your claim because of an undisclosed fender eliminator (or even a slip-on exhaust for that matter). I wouldn't expect to receive a settlement for the upgrade values, but I'm pretty sure that you would at least be compensated for the stock value of the bike. The mods that insurance companies particularly don't like are ones that alter the performance and/or compromise safety (eg. Turbo, Supercharger, Engine Swap, etc.)
Sorry to hear about the poor service. TD-MM has been awesome for me they take my money but alot less than any other insurer..
I hit a Deer last november 11/11/11(in a blazer), because it was a gov't holiday they offered and gave me a rental for 5 days even though I didn't have comprehensive. This was more than fair in my eyes...
I hit a Deer last november 11/11/11(in a blazer), because it was a gov't holiday they offered and gave me a rental for 5 days even though I didn't have comprehensive. This was more than fair in my eyes...
I believe most of those fender eliminators are not legal, but I'm just being devils advocate. The only thing that I could see happening would be if you got rearended and the turn signal or brake light visibility was put into question.......but I doubt anything would come of it.
EngineerJoe
Well-known member
Aside from light visibility, the only other thing that could be an issue is reflectors. If you remove your reflectors, and no new ones come with the FE kit, the insurance company may give you a hard time if your bike was hit while parked at night.
RickT
Well-known member
Sorry to hear of your problems with TD/MM. Exact same thing happened with me when I bought my Triumph Daytona except I was dealing with TD Primmum. Like you I argued that there was only one version of the Triumph Daytona and it was unbelievable that they would give me a quote on a Triumph Daytona then change the quote because their system says it's something more expensive to insure based solely on the serial number. Given that I had already purchased the bike I had no choice but to deal with them. Thankfully I got requoted the following year with TD/MM and due to an affiliation with the University my annual premium dropped in half.
Given that they are still doing this and coming up with huge swings in premium I wonder if it would do any good to complain to the Insurance Bureau of Canada (or whatever the appropriate governing body would be?).
Given that they are still doing this and coming up with huge swings in premium I wonder if it would do any good to complain to the Insurance Bureau of Canada (or whatever the appropriate governing body would be?).
Rick T. Complain to theinsurance Bureau!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The insurasnce industry owns them lock stock and barrel. I did last year and was told they could do nothing. They are a toothless agency. We can thank McQuinty for giving the Insurance store away to the industry a couple of years ago. We get less coverage, service at a considerable increase in cost of buying insurance. As was said on Rider Plus site by their spokeperson, Ontario Auto Insurance Reforms are Working", but at our expence. Insurance companies cannot be trusted to keep their word on anything they say. As soon as they open their mouth, nothing but lies comes out the same as politicians. After an accident or an occurance, do not talk to the insurance adjuster at all. Get a "LAWYER" to deal with them. You will be better off in the long run.
Complaints should be directed to the ombudsman, not the Insurance Bureau:
http://www.group.tdinsurance.com/en/customercare/solve/ombudsman
Viffer. In another post you said their was an agency that set rates. You told me this agency does not like high swing rates. i would like to get their phone number an call them and notify them of what Echelon has up my rates in one year. You can private e-mail me here on this board by PM me.
This is off topic -- in the future please start your own thread when you have specific comments or questions.
This contact is no secret. You can contact FSCO if you wish:
http://www.fsco.gov.on.ca/en/About/contact/Pages/default.aspx
If a company has increased your rate outside of the approval of FSCO, I would like to see them punished as much as you would. In general, a rate change is in the shape of a normal distribution -- the vast majority of people receiving a small change in rate, but then a few (about 5%) receiving large increases and a few (maybe 5%) receiving large decreases. You might have been in the top fifth percentile.
@Viffer: May I just say, with the upmost sincerity, thank you for your invaluable advice and information time and time again. GTAM is really lucky to have you on the forum and constantly responding to all our queries.
THANKS!
THANKS!
This is off topic -- in the future please start your own thread when you have specific comments or questions.
This contact is no secret. You can contact FSCO if you wish:
http://www.fsco.gov.on.ca/en/About/contact/Pages/default.aspx
If a company has increased your rate outside of the approval of FSCO, I would like to see them punished as much as you would. In general, a rate change is in the shape of a normal distribution -- the vast majority of people receiving a small change in rate, but then a few (about 5%) receiving large increases and a few (maybe 5%) receiving large decreases. You might have been in the top fifth percentile.
