FLSTC
Well-known member
Red & white running shoes - HA associate? Could be more than just impaired.
I think that's a bit presumptuous. I don't see a cut.Red & white running shoes - HA associate? Could be more than just impaired.
Doesn't make it right to leave the scene of an accident no matter how the collision happened, that's secondary, first would be to stop. By leaving the rider has now screwed himself over. History will be recorded with his name published in the media when he gets charged. The passenger too perhaps? I don't know. But try getting insurance, a job later etc.
The police have HA and affiliates on constant surveillance.
If you run then report next day, the police will follow your tracks to see if you were drinking. Then you'll get charged for both fail to remain and impaired.
I think they can use expert testimony (eg. bartender says Bob had eight shots between 12 and 1, expert uses Bobs weight to calculate possible range of BAC while driving, entire range is way over the legal limit, Bob admitted to driving, done). Now this is obviously a much harder prosecution than Bob blew 0.16 when stopped by police.Do they not need irrefutable evidence (roadside test/bloodtest/breathalizer, etc.) to prove DUI though? I've heard the same (immoral) advice to run if you get into a crash while drunk. Even if they trace you back to a bar its not enough to prove intoxication.
The news is reporting is as a male turned themselves in but we all know how accurate news is. Waiting for the press release.Just saw on cp24 breaking news coverage on the TV that an arrest has been made. Waiting on Police to post a news release.
Here's the official Police release:
Toronto Police Service :: News Release #44011
Unlicensed and no insurance.. explains the reason to run I guess