FLSTC
Well-known member
observation: red & white running shoes
Such hate here, especially with an absence of facts. Running, yes. But was the rider driving recklessly or did the kid run out between two cars? I’ll judge the rider and passenger for leaving after a collision with a child, but would have a much harsher opinion if there was some prior recklessness.
They were jaywalking apparently. If the motorcyclist stopped and helped with the investigation then he wouldn't be so vilified. He also dragged they child some distance after the initial contact. It's kind of hard to forgive this rider.Such hate here, especially with an absence of facts. Running, yes. But was the rider driving recklessly or did the kid run out between two cars? I’ll judge the rider and passenger for leaving after a collision with a child, but would have a much harsher opinion if there was some prior recklessness.
Why, the child isn't missing?I hope that the Borders have been notified. I also personally think that the Amber Alert should be issued. This one i wouldn’t mind to get any time day or night.
Why, the child isn't missing?
Such hate here, especially with an absence of facts. Running, yes. But was the rider driving recklessly or did the kid run out between two cars? I’ll judge the rider and passenger for leaving after a collision with a child, but would have a much harsher opinion if there was some prior recklessness.
Monthly??? By my count there were at least three in the GTA yesterday. Obviously the penalty for hit and run needs a gross adjustment as it seems many many people think it is worth the risk.Ye, i agree. I must have over reacted since it involved the child, but... two things would have happened. The rider would be caught within a day or two and hopefully it would send a stronger message to future “hit and runners”. Type “hit and run Ontario” and see what comes up. It’s almost a monthly thing now.
the Police reports of any accident always include “ the driver remained on scene”. I think it sends a very wrong message. Why on earth would you say that if the driver DID indeed remain on scene?
Reports say the kid ran out infront of the bike.
Why? Does this affect insurance availability/price forever or does it expire after a time period like other convictions?Even if he doesn't get jail time, he'll never ride again.
Or stolen bike, or riding dirty, or speeding, or no license, or . . . Lots of reasons are possible, none excuse the action.The cp24 report did state that the child ran out into the road. The rider may not have had any chance to avoid the collision. That being said, why run? As someone else pointed out, the most logical reason to run is alcohol.
I actually don't know... I guess I meant figuratively. 5-10 years?Why? Does this affect insurance availability/price forever or does it expire after a time period like other convictions?