You read it here first - I'm fed up with motorcyclists being prohibited from riding in Ontario's HOV lanes unless they have a passenger on the back. Not only is this dumb, but Ontario is the only jurisdiction in the entire world to have this ridiculous law.
cars, SUVs, pick-ups... they're all subject to the same rules.
its a lane to promote carpooling, it is to reward people for bringing less vehicles into the city, thus reducing congestion on the roads, it may even have hte side effect of less pollution because of less cars. Riding a motorcycle alone does not do any of those things. So, why exactly do you feel this sense of entitlement?
Edit:
I'm not trolling, i'm just saying that just because you get a lot of signatures and start whining about it doesn't mean you deserve what you want. Bring them some reasons telling them why you deserve what you want. Tell them you fit the definition, that the vehicle you ride does solve the kind of problem that making these lanes was meant to achieve.
here is the HOV lane website... halfway down the page they have definitions, and pictures showing you what the lanes intend to do, convince them that motorcycles do that, and then you have a shot at getting it.
http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/traveller/hov/index.shtml#whatis
Also, they seem to have taken a liking to "green" vehicles, they see that those vehicles provide a benefit to environment, and are rewarding people for using those vehicles by granting access to HOV lanes.
http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/dandv/vehicle/electric/ev-green-plates.shtml
find some reasons about why you believe motorcycles provide some sort of benefit.
personally, despite regularly riding in HOV lanes. i think its perfectly justified not being allowed in them w/o passengers. even with a passenger, a motorcycle takes up a whole lane space, which could be taken up by a car carrying 4-7 people, if they all rode motorcycles instead that would be 2-4 bikes. motorcycles seem like an inefficient use of space in those lanes.