I inquired to several insurers recently and heard something concerning about that - apparently insurers can make you exhaust all your sources of income before they agree to payout on that. Most concerning was the mention of RRSP and other investment income. Being forced to deplete your retirement savings because of an accident which leaves you unable to work seems, well..******.
The standard $400 is wholly inadequate for most people, me and my wife included. I'd like to jack it up to the $1K/week limit (the cost is pretty reasonable indeed) but when I heard the bit about (potentially) being forced to exhaust our retirement income and/or investments before they'd agree to actually start paying that out, well...I'm digging into that some more to see if that was just a "we'd rather you not sign up for that as it increases our liability" type thing, just plain bad information, or an actual threat that they can use to avoid paying out on those who actually need said benefits.
Our financial advisor/insurance guy is coming a week next Monday and I'll be picking his brain about that. If that is actually the case I'll be looking for some third-party income replacement options instead, as I'm not interested in destroying our retirement because of an accident one of both of us can't work afterwards.