Well, Devils Advocate, he was denied parole last time because he had shown zero remorse, taken no steps to address his obvious alcohol issues, not joined the in prison AA meetings or optioned counciling. He got with the programs when it became obvious that was his ticket out.
Not saying people cant change, wont change. This guy? I'm not paying his assurity bond.
He still thinks it takes 8 or 9 drinks to get drunk to the point where he cant drive.
"And then there was the time three years before the crash when he got so drunk that police had to be called: Denied entry to a Vaughan nightclub because of his intoxication, he and a friend “began to fight with the bouncers and also threatened their lives.
Police attended the scene and arrested you; you were reported to be belligerent and rude to the police, refused to follow their instructions and yelled at them. Once you were placed in the rear seat of the police car, you made several attempts to kick the windows out.
No one had heard about this incident before — not the sentencing judge or the parole board until shortly before the hearing. Muzzo initially claimed to have forgotten about it — because you forget about a time when you’re charged with intoxication in a public place and held in a police station.
You have to wonder — how did that get buried so deep?
Even now, he still doesn’t get it.
Muzzo shocked everyone at the parole hearing when he said he’d need to consume eight or nine drinks before considering himself impaired in the context of driving.
During the hearing, for the first time since you were arrested, you outlined a significant history of binge drinking and this, coupled with your lack of understanding of the issue of impairment, leads the board to conclude your risk remains undue,” the decision states.
Your contention (even at this late date), that you believe eight or nine drinks would be required to make you impaired, speaks volume in this regard.”
