Q
qwertyuiop
Guest
...
Last edited:
Male Wanted in Relation to a Fail to Remain Accident
- Thread starter bww77
- Start date
Apparently I do. As I said, special conditions. He was not permitted to be outside of a specific area and was, so his mere presence was a breach of recognizance. This is a condition that is frequently placed upon parolees. It had nothing to do with him being in a collision, as you have been trying to assert.
OpenGambit
Banned
Exactly, he could have walked out of Hamilton and that would be a breach.
Q
qwertyuiop
Guest
...
Last edited:
OpenGambit
Banned
I know he is a criminal.
As I said, all that we need to know is "breach of recognizance" and "fled the scene." That says all that we need to know about him, when he left someone bleeding on the road.
rmemedic
Well-known member
The guy sounds like a loser. If my sister was ever hanging around a guy like this, she wouldn't be once I found out.
First he has gotten himself in to enough trouble to have been jailed and then again to have his family post bail. Then, he stupidly risks his family money and homes so he can take some girl through Mississauga when he was told to not leave Hamilton... I think everyone can see what kind of guy this dude is... The kind of guy that doesn't give a damn about anyone except himself.
I find it entertaining how all these people that know this guy and are sticking up for him are new members to the forum... Including the victims sister who must be a saint if she's real... But considering all these people talk in pretty much the same manner it makes me even more suspicious...
OpenGambit
Banned
The next one will be named zxcvbnm
You were trying to imply that he ran out of concern for his family who put up $$$ for his bail conditions. It sounds like he should've thought about them before leaving Hamilton in the first place. No sympathy from anyone here, regardless of what the specific conditions were or "what kind of person he is".
I'm betting on something numeric, just as a change of pace.
On the contrary. It is because people are missing information that they speculate.
You say he wasn't drunk, OK let's take that at face value. Now people will stop speculating that he may have been drunk. See how that works?
But you can't have it both ways. "I won't tell you anything and you need to stop with the conjecture" is about as likely as some guy losing his keys somewhere and telling him "you shouldn't look for them since you don't know where they are".
Last edited:
Will he then start posting commas instead of dots when he decides to delete all the previous posts?
Will he then start posting commas instead of dots when he decides to delete all the previous posts?
Thankfully people quoted him in time to preserve his brilliance in perpetuity.
