OpenGambit
Banned
Not sure what the Supreme Court of Justice is either. How many years have you worked with bylaws and regulations again?
lane splitting and cagers honking
- Thread starter ep1x
- Start date
- Status
Not sure what the Supreme Court of Justice is either. How many years have you worked with bylaws and regulations again?
That sent a shiver up my spine. Women scare me. :lmao:
awyala
Guest
Holy Fak....typo again! Supreme Court of Ontario: High Court of Justice. I rushed the short form on that one.
awyala
Guest
My particular mirrors extend more than most and also fold more easily than most. The mirrors in my case define the outer extremity of the bike on their sides, however in some cases folding them in helps to make cars less nervous as opposed to our mirrors being close. I do it as a courtesy in the event it makes some cars nervous, not in the case that I'll be knocking elbows on car mirrors instead.
It is just a suggestion for added courtesy, to put some cars at greater ease. In your case I'll be sure to propose marriage before I filter past.
If by "do what you can" you are implying physical assault or endangerment, well then bravo you fall into the camp of a road rager and exemplify the worst kind of attitude. However if by "can" you mean calling a police officer and reporting that I drove close to you, or trying to speak to me in a civil manner, then by all means. But expect the same intolerant reaction from others next time you do anything at all out of 100% social norms, forget about laws. If you have bad breath or stand too close to me in a line, I'll be sure to do everything in my power to make sure you never to that again. Let's all play the psuedo-vigilante game. Let's all make veiled threats over minor issues. Welcome to the GTA Motorcycle community.
Did you also pay for the V-Threat license with your V-Bulletin lisence?
Last edited:
awyala
Guest
Agreed.
OpenGambit
Banned
Thats 3 times, and this tells everyone just how good you are with the law and legal processes.
The Supreme Court of Ontario hasn't existed for over 20 years.
awyala
Guest
Zing. You win. Filtering is 100% illegal and I'm full of ****. Nothing I said is of any value because of typos. I'm sure the courts let cases slide too when cops make any sort of typo on the paperwork. I'll use that same line next time I'm appealing a parking ticket to Her Magesty, after the Governer General bumps it up due to the magnitude of the case.
So I shouldn't be upset when you drive by me on the line between lanes (I won't bother with nomenclature) because when you get to the light, you will proceed faster than I can anyway. Then another bike and another do the same thing. At some point some of these bikes must need to wait for the other bikes to proceed first, before they can go. And I must wait for them to proceed before I can go. I have now been delayed. Therefore I have a reason to be unhappy. I might just honk.
OpenGambit
Banned
Magesty is a typo, Governer is a typo.
Having no clue at all about the courts that you claim to be so comfortable going to isn't a typo. Thats you being full of ****.
Have a nice day.
awyala
Guest
This often happens in countries where filtering is rife. But at that point a couple of things happen; bikes filter on all sides, get to the front then spread out, or at that point of congestion and social acceptance it has become tolerated. Toronto is no where near that point and will never be like that. It remains and will remain a niche thing. On the other hand, by that time Toronto will have a congestion charge and you'll be filtering along pi$sed out of your pants that a more agile scooter filtered better than you and cut across to the next filter line between two bumpers while your cruiser or SS cant articulate such an angle, then you'll rage cause that is your nature.
awyala
Guest
You're entirely correct, defence cases, appeals legal documents, any regulatory submission are often never proofed checked like a web forum, and often any spelling mistake is grounds for complete dismissal and added charges. Before spell check our entire legal system was in shambles. In fact I'm pretty sure a spell checker software is in charge of our entire legal system at present as that criteria alone outweighs analytical thinking.
Also I the think if the rear portion of your tie is longer than the front portion I believe you are charged with contempt and thrown into a holding cell.
OpenGambit
Banned
Good try
Supreme Court of Appeal - Not a typo, just wrong
Supreme Court of Justice - Also not a typo, just wrong
Supreme Court of Ontario - Again not a typo, but like the other 2 above, does not exist.
There is nothing spelling related in any of your mistakes above, its 100 % lack of knowledge. Its awesome that you come here and talk about how you have 11 years of experience dealing with by-laws and regulations, but you have no clue at all about the system that interprets all our laws. The more you type, the more it's apparent to me, as well as anyone else reading, that you are talking out of your ***.
Tell me again about how you are so comfortable going to these courts.
Hell, find me an address because I want to see you appear at them.
Last edited:
Finally you speak some truth.
awyala
Guest
Buddy seriously, you dropped the name of a Justice in the highest court of apeal in Ontario, who raaaaaaaaaaarely hear the apeals of even lost first round apeals after an initial traffic court ruling. So that's level 1) cop when being pulled over, level 2) traffic court, level 3) first apeal, theeeeeeeeeeeeen level 4) Ontario Court of Apeal. You're full of **** to think that's where it will end up before you bother to believe anyone's argument. You come off as a bitter snob and it's sad, for real it's sad man.
So you name drop, say very little, offer no analysis and drama queen the whole thing up....and followed by any of your own credentials? hmmm nope.
In the end, if you want to dismiss the my whole point 2 lines in and based on typos, or hell, even an error....cause you don't ever make a mistake as that would shred your entire credibility, then go ahead dismiss everything I said....but all I am saying is that "filtering" is not explicitly illegal and not illegal in it's entirety. But hey, dismiss everything based on my fumbling of a reference you made to an obsurdly exagerated name drop you peppered in there to come off as high and mighty.
You know what, I am meeting with Justice Bigelow on business at OCH tomorrow, maybe I'll ask him to have a personal mediation to go over your views. Despite the drama and irrelevence, I'll name drop too; I mean if we are engaging in sophistry now, but then again....it's really already in your name isn't it!
Last edited:
Relevant parts of this post bolded for ease of skimming...
Too late. This one is too far gone.
OpenGambit
Banned
Ontario Court of Appeal decision = required to overrule trial decisions that leave little question that a bike sharing a lane with a car at whatever speed is illegal.
If you want to have a credential fight. ok.
Osgoode Hall Law School
Law Society of Upper Canada.
awyala
Guest
Lawyer vs Architect; In this arena of legal credentials I concede defeat.
- Status
