Trials
Well-known member
Fortunately, the push is to make filtering legal, but nbody is trying to make it manditory. Why be against this? Procede with the caution you do with everything you do on two wheels. You can filter when you feel its a safe place to do so, and not filter when you feel safer at the back of the pack.
Because my motorcycle insurance rates are directly proportionate to the rate of motorcycle accidents and our collective insurance rates are going to see a huge increase in car door dents and paint jobs. The cars in these altercations will never be found at fault, it will be 'the motorcycle sideswiped the car' and the drivers will become accustomed to motorcycles not requiring as much space on the road as trucks and cars.
To the other posts;
No, they very clearly said stopped, and that is why I quoted it. Nothing to do with not supporting or any other such nonsense, I simply see this as something that is not being proposed in a practical manor. They either implement all 3 forms of motorcycles not needing to observe the lane markings, or they leave us the entitlement and obligation to the same space as a small car.
... when was the last time you were in a traffic jam of nicely arranged and spaced cars all in a staggered stationary formation like that?
The moment the cars start moving :/ now you are lane splitting and in the proposal this will be considered dangerous and illegal.
Guidelines where this has been implemented suggest 2 feet of clearance on each side of your motorcycle, so we are looking for about a 6 foot wide space between cars and trucks to make use of this maneuver.
Caption on this photo reads: "A motorcyclist drives between two cars at a stoplight in downtown Toronto. (Greg Ross/CBC)"
What it should read is: 'WTF are you going dude and if you scratch it you pay for it.'