lmaoBack in your thirties?
Sent from a Samsung Galaxy far, far away using Tapatalk
lmaoBack in your thirties?
Back in your thirties?
lmao
Sent from a Samsung Galaxy far, far away using Tapatalk
Wtf is wrong with the parents? Where are the parents? Waste of time and resources? Who the hell grows up thinking it's a good idea to point a weapon at a helicopter? Let alone a police helicopter? Society needs a serious redo. People are hopeless
Who raises kids to raise kids to point weapons at helicopters?
Why bother fixing the hopeless here? That would cost money.. It's way more profitable bombing the third world hopeless half way around the world.
"If i was educated, I'd be a damn fool"
The one pointing the gun and laser was a member of Canada's Armed Forces. Maybe he was practising shooting down some third world airwolf.
I'm not sure you get the seriousness of blinding a pilot, even temporarily
http://www.pangolin.com/faa/laser-aircraft-animation-and-explanation.htm
it's really easy to get a laser from china that will leave someone permanently blind. that's all we need is a blind pilot flying a plane.
That's some nice thermal vision. I wonder how my camo will fare
http://jalopnik.com/man-hit-with-14-year-prison-sentence-for-shining-laser-1541598389 heres an article on the 14 year prison sentance, how ever the laser pointing was just part of it, there were other factors to the sentance.
talking to pilots when the laser hits the cockpit they end up losing night vision for a good 15-20 minutes, that means they can't see anything out there, whether it's a hydro line, another aircraft, some one flying a drone, hydro tower.
In this instance they're in a helicopter over what looks like a residential area. there are plenty of hazards.
That's some nice thermal vision. I wonder how my camo will fare
I don't know about you guys, but generally speaking, I see kids are being raised by video games more than their parents. After all, how often do you see kids that aren't playing games on their phones or iPads in the mall, restaurants, etc? Situation can't be so different at home. Then there was the time I saw a 9 year old kid's parents buy him GTA V even after multiple warnings of content with drugs, sex, (gun)violence from the clerk. Parents be like DILLIGAF?
What boggled my mind was the fact that the dad asked the kid "Are you sure you want this game?". Did he think the kid was going to say no?
Also, I believe he wasnt a "kid" but 19yrs old.
– "Socrates", Clouds by Aristophanes 470 BCEThe children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.
What boggled my mind was the fact that the dad asked the kid "Are you sure you want this game?". Did he think the kid was going to say no?
it's not just unrelated priors but he had probation issues. his girlfriend you'll note was only charged with one thing and got 5 years. and from the ground you don't know what the pilot is about to do and if they're low enough for you to aim at then likely they are taking off or landing or in a holding pattern.Thanks for looking that up. Sounds like he has had unrelated priors but the sentence is still pretty much due to the laser. They wanted to make an example of him. I get it but 14 years is terribly un-just.
The danger technically exists I won't argue that. I'll argue the severity of it though. A helicopter hovering over the city will not suddenly stop hovering or crash into something because of a momentary distraction unless it's while the pilot is performing some kind of maneuver close to the ground or near another object. I will give you this though... many helicopters have transparent areas near the feet which would make laser light refraction worse than in a plane. I think the issue I take with this whole anti-laser thing in general is that it's another example of something relatively minor that has been blown way out of proportion and people blindly hop on board.
I get it but 14 years is terribly un-just.
I don't think that the sentence is too harsh given the potential.
it's not just unrelated priors but he had probation issues. his girlfriend you'll note was only charged with one thing and got 5 years. and from the ground you don't know what the pilot is about to do and if they're low enough for you to aim at then likely they are taking off or landing or in a holding pattern.
here's where someone got blinded by one of those laser pointers, granted it's not in a plane but it shows the power that they have. http://blog.burningman.com/2015/03/...-black-dot-in-the-middle-of-everything-i-see/
I don't think that the sentence is too harsh given the potential.
The punishment needs to be stiff enough to make others think twice about committing the same horrendous act...
I wonder if you would be uttering those same words if it was your life that was ruined by some irresponsible lowlife...