Justin Trudeau – What's with the f**king mustache

Forum Sponsor
If y
PrivatePilot said:
Yeah, sure. I knew you'd say that. And if I only posted 'a few links' you'd say I couldn't back up all my statements.

What parts do you feel are "opinions" versus facts? Assuming you bothered to actually click on a single link I posted? I do my homework, now do yours.
Click to expand...
If you look back at what I wrote . The only link I asked for was the one about the soldiers . I already answered this earlier .
 
Consider yourself super duper educated on all the scandals of the day then.

Took me about 10 minutes to put it all together. I’ll survive. Google is easy to use. More people should try it.
 
pfbmgd said:
It actually it is the way debates work . You need to back up your facts/claims . Not sure what world you live in .
Click to expand...
False. A debate means you offer evidence and they offer counter evidence. You just said "i don't remember/I didn't hear about that" That isn't a debate....that's just being ignorant (in the traditional less pejorative sense). Again. If I say the world is round...."prove it" isn't a debate tactic.

In fact if we were debating whether Harper was a good prime minister on a debate team.....the points that were listed would be exactly what the judges would be looking for. That is how it works. One person would say that harper muzzled scientists, had the laws changed to protect the RCMP from the illegal actions they took in terms of the long gun registry etc. They wouldn't have to quote the news source. When you get in an argument with your friends about something do you say "well i read in the Toronto Sun that Trump incited violence with his speech yesterday"?

There is no debate that Harper prevented scientist from speaking about the results of their research when it didn't mesh with his politics. If you feel that Liberals are guilty of other things....that is fine. But it doesn't take away from the arguments that he was terrible. If you think he wasn't terrible put forth arguments for how he isn't. BUT Trudeau sucking is not an argument that Harper didn't suck too.
 
800over said:
False. A debate means you offer evidence and they offer counter evidence. You just said "i don't remember/I didn't hear about that" That isn't a debate....that's just being ignorant (in the traditional less pejorative sense). Again. If I say the world is round...."prove it" isn't a debate tactic.

In fact if we were debating whether Harper was a good prime minister on a debate team.....the points that were listed would be exactly what the judges would be looking for. That is how it works. One person would say that harper muzzled scientists, had the laws changed to protect the RCMP from the illegal actions they took in terms of the long gun registry etc. They wouldn't have to quote the news source. When you get in an argument with your friends about something do you say "well i read in the Toronto Sun that Trump incited violence with his speech yesterday"?

There is no debate that Harper prevented scientist from speaking about the results of their research when it didn't mesh with his politics. If you feel that Liberals are guilty of other things....that is fine. But it doesn't take away from the arguments that he was terrible. If you think he wasn't terrible put forth arguments for how he isn't. BUT Trudeau sucking is not an argument that Harper didn't suck too.
Click to expand...
Was he? Who decides what the criteria is?

What if Joe Plumber doesn't care about scientists but just wants his middle class tax breaks so his young family can improve their situation; and (for the sake of argument) Harper came through for him. Is Joe not allowed to say he felt Harper was a good one?

www.macleans.ca

Stephen Harper's dramatic tax cuts

Wells: Your taxes are down. That's a big change and it'll be hard to undo.
www.macleans.ca www.macleans.ca

EDIT: Funny, i read this long ago, I'm perusing it again and look what tid bit i found;

Justin Trudeau says “Canadians are struggling … there is no reason to raise taxes on them now.”
Click to expand...
Hi Carbon tax, have we met?
 
Evoex said:
Was he? Who decides what the criteria is?

What if Joe Plumber doesn't care about scientists but just wants his middle class tax breaks so his young family can improve their situation; and (for the sake of argument) Harper came through for him. Is Joe not allowed to say he felt Harper was a good one?

www.macleans.ca

Stephen Harper's dramatic tax cuts

Wells: Your taxes are down. That's a big change and it'll be hard to undo.
www.macleans.ca www.macleans.ca

EDIT: Funny, i read this long ago, I'm perusing it again and look what tid bit i found;


Hi Carbon tax, have we met?
Click to expand...
This guy who doesn't care about scientists....who wants a tax break....is an actual argument....I didn't know or I was not aware or prove it is not. I want lower taxes is certainly a valid argument for the quality of a PM and i would say is a reasonable one. In a debate wouldn't you say that is a valid point? Can't you see how "prove it" and i like low taxes are not the same thing?

And again....saying that Trudeau sucks doesn't mean that Harper doesn't. It is like Don Jr. Complaining that other dictators haven't had their twitter accounts blocked.
 
800over said:
This guy who doesn't care about scientists....who wants a tax break....is an actual argument....I didn't know or I was not aware or prove it is not. I want lower taxes is certainly a valid argument for the quality of a PM and i would say is a reasonable one. In a debate wouldn't you say that is a valid point? Can't you see how "prove it" and i like low taxes are not the same thing?

And again....saying that Trudeau sucks doesn't mean that Harper doesn't. It is like Don Jr. Complaining that other dictators haven't had their twitter accounts blocked.
Click to expand...
I never said that?
 
One thing i do know for sure, is Harper is not the prime minister.

Seems some people always like to complain and compare to to old regime
 
ToSlow said:
Seems some people always like to complain and compare to to old regime
Click to expand...
Super annoying when people do that.
www.gtamotorcycle.com

Justin Time

Funny you said Trump but all I could think of was Trudeau and we did it twice. Whose the bigger fool? Yup. I agreed above when was called out for Trudeau as well. Although I will say I'm happier with JT's performance compared to Trump's in this whole apocalypse...but still spending like a...
www.gtamotorcycle.com www.gtamotorcycle.com
 
Good find, that was Obama’s speech for Biden campaign so somewhat current
I’m surprised someone thats got me blocked would put that much effort in
 
Last edited:
ToSlow said:
You’re just miserable and unhappy
Click to expand...

Between you and PFB I feel like we're stuck in a game of "I know you are, but what am I?" from grade 6 or something.

I'm quite happy to live in Canada despite our issues and faults. There's a reason Canada as a whole and lots of our cities are almost always present on the "Best places in the world to live" rankings.

I always suggest that people who think everything sucks here to feel free to leave and go see if the grass is greener on the other side of the fence.
 
PrivatePilot said:
Between you and PFB I feel like we're stuck in a game of "I know you are, but what am I?" from grade 6 or something.

I'm quite happy to live in Canada despite our issues and faults. There's a reason Canada as a whole and lots of our cities are almost always present on the "Best places in the world to live" rankings.

I always suggest that people who think everything sucks here to feel free to leave and go see if the grass is greener on the other side of the fence.
Click to expand...
Brother i was joking with you
 
PrivatePilot said:
I’m not the one miserable and unhappy with living here.
Bud
Click to expand...
Just because I live in the real world does not mean I'm unhappy . You should look at yourself see maybe you are miserable and unhappy . I think you maybe projecting your emotions on me .
Forum Sponsor
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom