It's about damn time...

mimico_polak

Well-known member
Site Supporter
I've said it before and I'll say it again. They are powered by a motor and should be regulated, insured and lic'd as such. All they are now is an excuse for people with dui's or those who think they shouldn't have to play by the same rules and system as the rest of us. I have to pay insurance, why shouldn't they. How do police expect them to "follow the rules of the road" when they don't have to have a drivers license? Total joke
 
I hope the police action to help correct operators of these things get traction.
I'm pretty tired of getting scared off the bike/walking/dog paths with idiots on silent electric motors giving no warning they are closing at 20km.

Sometimes you can smell them coming if your downwind since they usually have a butt hanging out of thier mouth.
 
But operators are banned by city bylaw from using their electrical assist bikes on all bike paths, like the Martin Goodman Trail. Disobeying that edict could cost you $395 in fines and surcharges.

And if travelling on a city street with a designated bike lane, e-bikes are also banned by city bylaw from travelling in the bike lane unless they are using only muscular power. If caught and convicted, the fine and surcharges come to $80.

I did not know either of these. I have seen them both done quite regularly though.
 
I did not know either of these. I have seen them both done quite regularly though.

I'd say the majority of the people using those e-bikes don't know either of those rules...the rest don't care. I knew they weren't allowed on the Martin Goodman trail, but I didn't know about the bike lane restriction. I say insure them and license them.
 
That would be called a motorcycle.

Maybe they should be licensed as limited speed motorcycles. it's an existing class of vehicles with established insurance rates. Similarly to how a Nissan Leaf is still a car even though it doesn't burn fuel.

Any attempt to push insurance onto ebikes will almost immediately eliminate the category though. If the upfront cost and running costs are similar (LSM's burn very little fuel), why the hell would you choose to ride an ebike?
 
I did not know either of these. I have seen them both done quite regularly though.

I was not aware this was expressly illegal either - is this recent legislation, or has it always been that way?
 
Maybe they should be licensed as limited speed motorcycles. it's an existing class of vehicles with established insurance rates. Similarly to how a Nissan Leaf is still a car even though it doesn't burn fuel.

Any attempt to push insurance onto ebikes will almost immediately eliminate the category though. If the upfront cost and running costs are similar (LSM's burn very little fuel), why the hell would you choose to ride an ebike?

I think the concept of an e-bike is to offer a vehicle with the benefits of a bicycle but with a broader appeal. To do so they limited them to electric motors and to 32km/h. They are not intended as an electric version of a motorcycle, even though they look like scooters and are often confused for scooters. That is why they can slow down traffic like bicycles, and why they are allowed to run unlicensed and uninsured.

Someone could reasonably argue that they need to be licensed, but they would then have to step back and include cyclists into their discussion. Either the rules would apply equally to cyclists or they wouldn't, based on some differentiating criteria. There are also hybrid "electric assist" bikes that offer a power boost to the cyclist's pedalling. To simply say e-bikes need to be licensed misses the bigger picture.
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again. They are powered by a motor and should be regulated, insured and lic'd as such. All they are now is an excuse for people with dui's or those who think they shouldn't have to play by the same rules and system as the rest of us. I have to pay insurance, why shouldn't they. How do police expect them to "follow the rules of the road" when they don't have to have a drivers license? Total joke

I'm thinking along the same lines, but that still leaves unlicensed, uninsured cyclists who are also expected to follow the rules of the road. Should they be licensed too?
 
I'm thinking along the same lines, but that still leaves unlicensed, uninsured cyclists who are also expected to follow the rules of the road. Should they be licensed too?

I almost wanted to say yes but realized how stupid it would be, then you might as well have joggers get licenses too.

There needs to be some way to educate these people to

#1. Get the **** off the side walk
#2. Stop at red lights!
 
Yup, just saw one blow through a red light this morning.
So what happens when one of them causes an accident? Say the goof hits a car, a biker or even worse, a pedestrian. They are not insured and don't carry vehicle plates. Hit and run anyone?

Perhaps, instead of licensing and enforcing e-bikes we might just cancel it all along for motorcycles? To make it fair.
 
"Focusing on e-bikes from July 29th to August 31st"
How about focusing on those damn things the whole summer?
 
Those things should be classified as a moped
 
I have a special place in my heart for the inebriated ones that pull up alongside me at lights to engage me in the following interlocution:
"nice bike"
"thanks"
"I (used to) have a gixxer"
(light turns green) vrooom....
 
I'm thinking along the same lines, but that still leaves unlicensed, uninsured cyclists who are also expected to follow the rules of the road. Should they be licensed too?

That's more grey area in my opinion. They're at least human powered. These idiots on e-bikes are not and MANY of them are just using it as a way around having a DUI. Sadly some cyclists are just as stupid, ruining it for those that are not. Same can be said with anything though, motorcycles included.


Sent from my commodore 64 on dial up
 
That's more grey area in my opinion. They're at least human powered. These idiots on e-bikes are not and MANY of them are just using it as a way around having a DUI. Sadly some cyclists are just as stupid, ruining it for those that are not. Same can be said with anything though, motorcycles included.


Sent from my commodore 64 on dial up

If they would charge these idiots it would get better you can not ride a ebike legally if you have a dui.
 
Forgive me fellow riders for I have sinned.

I bought my dad an e-bike last month, actually a Motorino Xpd / Honda ruckus clone, and have been riding it around whenever I get a chance. :( It's fun not having to gear up and feel the wind on my face while being forced to ride under most speed limits. Drivers look at me funny and kids always laugh and stare but I don't care, it makes me feel warm and fuzzy like I'm the albino brother of the motorcycle community.

I also ride it like a motorcycle on the street, not on the sidewalk, signal and do shoulder checks. Trust me that I can appreciate safety conscious e-bike riders and am here to defend e-bike's as an alternative transportation method.
 
Back
Top Bottom