Here's the calculator,No I have way more water flowing
I think I would have better odds making it over a jump than that bridge.@Trials Why the bridge? Don’t you just jump over obstacles on trials bikes?
I'll bet Fish and Game would have something to say about you installing one of those in navigable waters.If you have a river with better then a meter of head you can make your own hydro electricity for a few thousand $
then you have something worthwhile powering that inverter
Sad but true. Try to do something to avoid burning fossil fuel and the studies will quickly sale past crazytown for economic viability. If you want to run off fossil fuel things get much simpler.I'll bet Fish and Game would have something to say about you installing one of those in navigable waters.
Have you done the required environmental impact studies?
That's what the other guys said tooI think I would have better odds making it over a jump than that bridge.
That ain't no navigable waters unless you're an OtterI'll bet Fish and Game would have something to say about you installing one of those in navigable waters.
Have you done the required environmental impact studies?
IIRC the definition is brutal. Something like navigable by a minnow counts. Mention Red Side Dace to a developer and watch the blood drain from their head.That ain't no navigable waters unless you're an Otter
The chance that the MECP would discover your power plant between two private lakes is low. The chance that your power plant affects much is low. The letter of the law is likely that you need to do all of the required studies, apply for a permit to take water, etc. Hell you need to do a lot of work to put a pond in an existing stream (if you're not a beaver) even though once it is filled, you have obviously not affected inflow nor outflow.I promise to only use a little bit of the swamp water spilling out,
absolutely there are minnows, it's a stream between 2 healthy fishing lakes :|
I'm quite sure they'll never ever find out about that item being in there, unless someone speaks up.I'll bet Fish and Game would have something to say about you installing one of those in navigable waters.
Have you done the required environmental impact studies?
Build pond...blame it on beaver...loophole!The chance that the MECP would discover your power plant between two private lakes is low. The chance that your power plant affects much is low. The letter of the law is likely that you need to do all of the required studies, apply for a permit to take water, etc. Hell you need to do a lot of work to put a pond in an existing stream (if you're not a beaver) even though once it is filled, you have obviously not affected inflow nor outflow.
To calculate the efficiency of a water turbine you need head and flow.About 20 feet wide by 4 feet deep
Sent from my moto g(8) plus using Tapatalk
To calculate the efficiency of a water turbine you need head and flow.
head (feet) × flow (gpm) ÷ 10 = W
head (m) x flow (l/m) ÷ 125 = W
So... a 4' head through a 6" plastic pipe would give you about 4150gal/min, or about 1655 watts (if you can maintain the flow without draining the pond)
run your numbers through their calculatorHere's the calculator,
the site also gives you details on how to measure the flow rate more accurately
Low Head Advanced Calculator
*Please note this calculator may not work well on touchscreen devices*www.powerspout.com
I have an ancient Honda EX800, it's 35 years old. I think it cost $450 in '85, they still fetch $300 today. That's more than a brand new PA 900watt cheepie.I bought a Honda EU2000 inverter generator for about $1200-$1300 taxes in about ten years ago and it has performed flawlessly. I just checked Kijiji and they are asking $900-$1100 for them used. Not a bad investment if you ask me.
The chance that the MECP would discover your power plant between two private lakes is low. The chance that your power plant affects much is low. The letter of the law is likely that you need to do all of the required studies, apply for a permit to take water, etc. Hell you need to do a lot of work to put a pond in an existing stream (if you're not a beaver) even though once it is filled, you have obviously not affected inflow nor outflow.
I'll bet Fish and Game would have something to say about you installing one of those in navigable waters.
Have you done the required environmental impact studies?