1st world White problems...
1st world White problems...
While the law and changes to them may be wrote by religious people (not the church itself )or challenged by them such as Slavery or miscegenation (christians fought on both sides of both of these). They are not based on any particular religious creed, especially not the 10 commandments as some people seem to think, Canada's legal heritage is in the laws of UK and the crown they them selfs are based on older laws mostly from a pre-christian Britain.
Personally if i sign the Anthem i exchange the word "God" for "lets". It works just as well but i don't advocate for a change to an historic work as a matter of government policy. But as noted the original was changed to include a religious refrences probably to placate the evangelics and catholics as was popular in the day.
In old England, the church was the head of state. We have a lot of laws from the crown. So these religious people were christians.
Where do you get your facts from?
They should take religion out of "O' Canada" first.
Absolutely! I dont understand this whole GOD thing in there! Are atheists/agnostics not Canadians? Do we not pay taxes? This is ridiculous and they really need to take it out
Absolutely! I dont understand this whole GOD thing in there! Are atheists/agnostics not Canadians? Do we not pay taxes? This is ridiculous and they really need to take it out
Aren't there Christians in Canada?
If you don't believe in God why would you even care?
How does an Athiests life change one iota because there is a reference to a God they don't believe in?
There are many other religions in Canada that do not pray to a god or a deity they call god. SOme have many gods and many people dont believe in one. A national anthem is supposed to be inclusive and not exclusive. When you represent one groups belief in a national anthem while ignoring the others, that's not right. But i thought it was pretty straight forward so i didnt feel the need for an explaination. But here you go.
Someone needs to smack her around. Ship her off to Liberia so she can worry about Canibals instead.
Youre right and im not getting worked up. And its not like im saying we should put 'Science keep our land" or "Spaghetti monster keep our land". Im just saying lets not put words that exclude a huge part of a nation that have to stand up and be proud of an anthem they dont (in parts) believe in.Pretty much. The "God" reference does not bother me personally. Its not about if an "atheists" care they might they might not most wont. But i can see the argument being made from secularist point of view. But its a relatively minor one worth getting worked up about.
Did you just watch that vice documentary too?
I posted it on the forum a month ago ....
I knew it was bad...but...man...
I will always remember what General Butt Naked said he did to prepare the troops. They would kill an innocent child maybe 11. Cut his heart into little pieces. All the soldiers would eat a piece and drink the blood to feel invincible.
There are many other religions in Canada that do not pray to a god or a deity they call god.
SOme have many gods
and many people dont believe in one.
A national anthem is supposed to be inclusive and not exclusive. When you represent one groups belief in a national anthem while ignoring the others, that's not right. But i thought it was pretty straight forward so i didnt feel the need for an explaination. But here you go.
Really, which religions exactly and whom do they then "worship"?
So if they pluralized the word "God" then at least they'd cover more people no?
So how exactly are their lives negatively affected by a reference to something they don't believe exists?
Unfortunately you can't be inclusive of everything and everyone, Unless of course you add wording something to the effect of "those who believe in a God" and "those who believe in many gods" and "for those athiests ignore any reference to God or gods".
That would be kinda hard to put to music now wouldn't it.......