impaired world

punky

Member
There is lots of impaired driving criminal acts happening out there, whether it be texting, changing a song on mobile device, eating, makeup, drunk driving, etc.... it is happening, and most of us are against this. Well i found this page that looks very interesting, which i went ahead and "Liked" the page too...so i am just sharing that info here, check it out.


Our Mission is to Raise Awareness of Impaired & Distracted Driving while Operating a Motor Vehicle. To Prevent and Share the Consequences of this Crime....give us a Like...https://www.facebook.com/impairedworld

or @impairedworld if twitter is your thing.
 
Last edited:
Ontario looking at demerit points for distracted drivers



People using their phones as they drive in downtown Toronto last month.


Transportation Minister Glen Murray says a combination of an intense education campaign and demerit points should help turn the tide of deadly distracted driving.
“We are going to be moving in the very near future,” Murray told the Star Tuesday.
MPPs of all political stripes are calling on the government to tack demerit points on to the $155 fine introduced four years ago for using hand-held devices while driving.
The Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) says motorists talking on cellphones or texting are killing more people on Ontario highways than impaired drivers.
Murray said just as drunk driving became publicly unacceptable through years of education, it is his intention to approach the growing problem of cellphone use and texting while driving in a two-prong way.
“What we learned with drunk driving is that without an education campaign it doesn’t work as well . . . you’ve got to have the authority of law . . . regulations and you’ve got to have a very robust education program,” he said in an interview.
The minister said just as Mothers Against Drunk Drivers led the way on reducing impaired driving he hopes others like Canadian Automobile Association will lead the charge on distracted driving.
“Our drunken driving fatalities are way, way down and it is one of the most successful programs ever run in Canada — we have 50 per cent less than the national average,” he said.
IBC’s Doug DeRabbie told reporters the Insurance Bureau since 2009 has been asking for stiff penalties for distracted driving.
“We have looked at impaired driving versus distracted driving and actually there have been more fatalities recently with respect to distracted drivers as opposed to impaired driving,” DeRabbie said.
He noted that so far this year there have been some 50 fatalities in Ontario compared to 30 caused by impaired driving.
Liberal MPP Bas Balkissoon (Scarborough-Rouge River) currently has a private member’s bill before the legislature calling for demerits points in addition to increased fines for motorists nabbed for talking or texting on their phones.
“Just about everybody is supportive . . . I would say there is a real groundswell of support for this particular legislation. And it is absolutely needed,” Balkinsoon told Queen’s Park news conference.
Elliott Silverstein, of the Canadian Automobile Association (CAA) South Central Region, said later more than 80 per cent of CAA members want to see stronger penalties, including demerit point for distracted driving infractions.
“The result is that people are 23 times more likely to have an accident when they are texting and driving . . . so we need to make some changes to make Ontario’s road even safer,” he told reporters.
Ottawa resident Rick Levesque, who initiated a provincewide petition calling for changes to the Highway Traffic Act to incorporate demerit points, told the news conference that provinces, where such a change has been made, have seen a reduction in distracted driving.
“Somebody needs to do something,” Levesque said.
Tory MPP Jeff Yurek (Elgin-Middlesex-London) said the average time to answer a phone call is 10.6 seconds and if a motorist is driving at 100 km/h that means he or she have covered 294 metres in that time, or three football fields.
“It is therefore no surprise that distracted driving has become the biggest road safety concern in Canada,” Yurek said.


http://www.thestar.com/news/queensp...e_bureau.html#mystars/users/registrations/new
 
Blaaaah, how about distracted ******* jaywalking.


Sent from the future using my GOLDEN iPhone 30 SS
 
What about the combo? Texting, lack of sleep, smoking, sugar high / low, loud radio, .03 BAC. Might as well be a Zombie.
 
What about the combo? Texting, lack of sleep, smoking, sugar high / low, loud radio, .03 BAC. Might as well be a Zombie.

Oh come on...

I say attach 4 points to distracted driving and ENFORCE it. Everyone I know my age is looking at the ****in road maybe 30% of the time they're driving. Most are on G2 licenses. 4 points seems appropriate considering the penalties for DUI.
 
Oh come on...

I say attach 4 points to distracted driving and ENFORCE it. Everyone I know my age is looking at the ****in road maybe 30% of the time they're driving. Most are on G2 licenses. 4 points seems appropriate considering the penalties for DUI.


I concur, I think put a big dent in their wallet.
 
Thanks.

Show some support guys??

Sorry poser, not gonna like the page. I respect what you are doing and wish you luck, but you are quoting MADD and they push more propaganda than facts. I avoid any causes that give legitimacy to them as they have lost all touch with reality.
 
Sorry poser, not gonna like the page. I respect what you are doing and wish you luck, but you are quoting MADD and they push more propaganda than facts. I avoid any causes that give legitimacy to them as they have lost all touch with reality.

No problem, i can respect that.
I am gonna say i am a Newbie to all of this, i just see the need for me to do this, because i am not happy with how it is today.
And another attempt to help save lives, and injuries.. I don't see the wrong in this.
I have a different aim, just hoping it will help.

I did quote MADD yes, because i am feeding for info to share to my followers. As far as i see it, they are helping to save lives too.
From here on out, i will refrain from quoting MADD(thanks to you). Although i can't help it if i post an article from News sites about DUI and MADD is mentioned.
In no way i am gonna be affiliated with MADD Canada or MADD Org.


As you can see, i have been around GTAM a bit, subscribed in a couple blocko threads and was aware of the bashing of MADD.
Just like johnnyp said, not many people know about MADD and what they do...me included, i didn't have the time for that...I do now!!
Jef(blocko) also chose to not include Madd in recent events, because of threads on here.

http://www.gtamotorcycle.com/vbforu...t-donations-quot-to-MADD-again&highlight=madd

I will be paying attention from now on, and also do some more research. I did read about the Founder leaving.

I have major plans going forward. Keep an eye out!!

Thanks.
 
MADD are fascists. I don't want them or any other organization like them dictating how I live my life. Their original goals may have been positive but the focus got skewed and distorted as they plowed on.

As for distracted driving, talking on the hand held cellphone has been proven to have no effect on driving or at least less of an effect then using a speaker or a wireless set. Texting - yes but so is eating, drinking, smoking, playing with the radio, GPS, fixing your makeup, etc. There's already a law in place that allows police to give out tickets for any type of behaviour that causes the driver to be distracted. Handheld cellphone ban is a publicity stunt.

I would rather see police do something else than give speeding tickets. But focus on decaying lack of respect for rules of the roads instead.

For example, huge number of people totally stopped signalling. They just weave in and out as they please or make left hand turns, ignoring the law and endangering the lives of others.
Same with running the red light. Especially evident after the green arrow ends for left turns. There's usually a line-up of 3-4 cars that force their way after the light has changed.
Also people making a right hand turn on red, from a middle lane...
People not staying in their lane after making their turn.
Tailgating.
Stopping way after the white line, blocking the pedestrians and your view of the intersection.
Bicycles and even more so - all these electric mopeds - routinely ignore any kind of traffic laws. Etc., etc.

I have witnessed cops observe all these violations and do nothing. Sure, speeding is easier to prove in court. Quick cash grab.
 
Last edited:
As long as there are exceptions to cell phone use and driving (police), I won't support any type of increased penalty. It's a stupid proposition too - we already have a provision for careless driving & dangerous driving. Just because someone has a phone up to their ear doesn't mean they're impaired, driving carelessly or dangerously eg police exception. If they are, use the appropriate laws that already exist.
 
Distracted deaths down, injuries up

Distracted driving crashes killed fewer people in 2012, but the number of injuries was up significantly.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said 3,328 died in the distracted driving crashes, down slightly from 2011′s 3,360 fatalities.


About 421,000 injuries occurred in 2012, a 9 percent increase from the previous year (387,000). The NHTSA said it is “just beginning to identify distraction-related accidents,” so the totals of death and injuries no doubt are higher — as has been the case since use of mobile communications devices while behind the wheel became an issue in the 1990s.

The Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data indicated that overall traffic fatalities increased to 33,561 last year. That would be the first increase in deaths since 2005.
“Early estimates on (overall) crash fatalities for the first half of 2013 indicate a decrease in deaths compared to the same time frame in 2012,” the NHTSA said. The 2013 report did not break out distracted driving fatalities.
The NHTSA singled out deaths of pedestrians as a contributor to the increase in deaths. “Distracted walking” — pedestrians’ use of handheld devices that restrict hearing — is an emerging area of research and concern. Pedestrian deaths were up 6 percent.
NHTSA Administrator David L. Strickland said:

While we’re seeing some unfortunate trends, we’re also seeing progress in some parts of the country. We will continue to work closely with our federal, state and local partners to change the way motorists behave on our roadways and build public awareness of key issues that have the potential to save many lives.


2011′s fatalities were a slight increase over those of 2010. The DOT and NHTSA changed their methodology for tracking distracted driving crashes at the beginning of the decade, making long-term comparisons difficult.
 
While we are on the topic of driving hazards, lts get the cyclists their own lanes. Anyone who drives down town on a regular basis knows how close cyclists are to bumpers and their own injury or death. Its really scary and now they are riding in the middle of a car lane and dont give a damn about whos behind or around them ! Its is both dangerous and very scary as a driver because one tiny mistake on either side and they are dead.
 
Is there something in the HTA about having a really drunk passenger beside the driver?


Sent from the future using my GOLDEN iPhone 30 SS
 
As long as there are exceptions to cell phone use and driving (police), I won't support any type of increased penalty. It's a stupid proposition too - we already have a provision for careless driving & dangerous driving. Just because someone has a phone up to their ear doesn't mean they're impaired, driving carelessly or dangerously eg police exception. If they are, use the appropriate laws that already exist.

Careless driving and dangerous driving charges are usually laid at the end of the skid marks not at the beginning. This is crucial detail to note if you're under the vehicle that created the skid mark.
 
While we are on the topic of driving hazards, lts get the cyclists their own lanes. Anyone who drives down town on a regular basis knows how close cyclists are to bumpers and their own injury or death. Its really scary and now they are riding in the middle of a car lane and dont give a damn about whos behind or around them ! Its is both dangerous and very scary as a driver because one tiny mistake on either side and they are dead.

They ride in the middle of the car lane to give themselves more space. If they're in the middle you can't pass them too closely. It's legal.
 
The best way to END Distracted & Drunk driving is to Educate everyone about the Consequences and DANGER it possesses.
 
1455998_570936559644467_654389681_n.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom