Dresden
Well-known member
$350k will buy a 1-5 year old Toronto condo near a subway station, rentable for $1650. It'll be a 1 or a 1+1, 600-699sq-ft.
If you borrow $300k at 2.2% you're out $1300/mo in mortgage payments. Add $450 maintenance, $200 taxes; $1900 out of pocket.
$1650 rental income covers the $500 in interest, $450 in maintenance, and $200 in taxes. It then provides a further $500 directly into paying down your principal. You're -$300 per month, but that's money going directly into your principal, it's not a loss. The $350k condo is also then appreciating at 2-3% per year, if you buy smart.
Your post falls completely apart because you look at negative cashflow as a loss.
Also, I never said you can buy pre-construction with 5%. And the days of buying with 5% down are MOST CERTAINLY not over. I have no idea what you're talking about.
Right. So, pay into a negative cash flow on the hopes that the asset price will rise indefinitely, and so your tenant can pay down part of your mortgage. You're a hell of a contrarian, I'll give you that.
I too remember the florida crash in 2008. Betcha the ones who lost their a**es on the negative cashflow weren't the ones who scooped them up again at foreclosed prices. http://www.economist.com/node/12670800 ; http://www.economist.com/node/12608205
--------------------
I'm not bearish on RE investments in the GTA, but if you're in your late 20's/early 30's, it does not make sense to make a condo investment that will account for 75% of your portfolio. 25%, maybe.