Nobody should have special privileges based on religious beliefs. Absolutely ridiculous.
The 2 biggest factors for War are land or religion, nothing else comes close.This.
Religion has caused more problems than not. Before brown Muslims blowing things up, we already had white Catholics shoving their values down people's throats with a bible in one hand and gun in another (look up what happened with Japan, and India.)
There might be other religiousness **** shows between the two; I'm not a history major.
O.REG 610
6. (1) A person who is driving a motorcycle or a motor assisted bicycle is not required to comply with subsection 104 (1) of the Act if the person,
(a) holds a valid Class M1, M2 or M driver’s licence;
(b) is 18 years old or older;
(c) practises the Sikh religion;
(d) has unshorn hair; and
(e) habitually wears a turban and, at the time of driving, is wearing a turban.
Right arm of the free world.... FN FAL - Wikipedia
No. Its a cumbersome and heavy rifle, especially for armies that recruit teenagers. The Ak-47 is built like a tank but is inaccurate when you fire it, too much recoil, just like the FN FAL, the ideal rifle is the M-16, VERY accurate and light to carry and almost no recoil. But its delicate.
"White man's guilt" is what causes normally intelligent rational Canadians to let immigrants make exceptions to do stupid things, that not even those immigrants' Canadian born children would even understand. This is as crazy as it gets south of the border.I'd really like to see a Pastafarian challenge this by riding with their own religious headgear and fighting any charges in court. What about ladies who wear the hijab?