bboySushi
Well-known member
One thing that is often overlooked that was brought to my attention by a paralegal, is that if this is your first offense and it is minor, you may want to pay it as soon as possible. The reasoning is that it will not affect your insurance, and your 3 year countdown until it's wiped will start NOW instead of 6 months later when you get a trial. That gives you an extra half a year of leeway if you do get another ticket.
Example: I get a ticket Jan 2010. It's 10 over so I pay it. Then in July 2012 I get another ticket for 28 over. I can delay it by requesting FA, and then a trial and by that time my first ticket is off my record so my insurance rate is never touched. If I had tried to fight that ticket and lost then my tickets would overlap and i'd get screwed for a while.
side note: Is it true First Attendance can only reduce the ticket but not get rid of it? I have a 26 over (First ticket, clean record). I'm just planning to get it reduced at the FA and pay it since its minor and I don't want to risk losing more time by having a trial and not winning it and being out a few hundred.
Example: I get a ticket Jan 2010. It's 10 over so I pay it. Then in July 2012 I get another ticket for 28 over. I can delay it by requesting FA, and then a trial and by that time my first ticket is off my record so my insurance rate is never touched. If I had tried to fight that ticket and lost then my tickets would overlap and i'd get screwed for a while.
side note: Is it true First Attendance can only reduce the ticket but not get rid of it? I have a 26 over (First ticket, clean record). I'm just planning to get it reduced at the FA and pay it since its minor and I don't want to risk losing more time by having a trial and not winning it and being out a few hundred.