A little off topic but I am offended by people wearing these Nazi style helmets whether they are DOT legal or not.
lol @ this guy ^^^^^^^^^^^
A little off topic but I am offended by people wearing these Nazi style helmets whether they are DOT legal or not.
lol @ this guy ^^^^^^^^^^^
Laugh all you want but a cop seeing that helmet is going to draw attention whether it is DOT or not. Don't get me wrong I agree the cop was wrong ticketing a DOT helmet. My point is a lot of helmets like that are novelty helmets and it will draw police attention.
2. The helmet referred to in section 1 shall conform to the requirements of the, (a) Canadian Standards Association Standard D230 Safety Helmets for Motorcycle Riders and shall bear the monogram of the Canadian Standards Association Testing Laboratories;
(b) Snell Memorial Foundation and shall have affixed thereto the certificate of the Snell Memorial Foundation;
(c) British Standards Institute and shall have affixed thereto the certificate of the British Standards Institute;
(d) United States of America Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 218 and shall bear the symbol DOT constituting the manufacturer’s certification of compliance with the standard; or
(e) United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No. 22, “Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Protective Helmets and of Their Visors for Drivers and Passengers of Motor Cycles and Mopeds”, and shall have affixed thereto the required international approval mark. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 610, s. 2; O. Reg. 102/12, s. 1.
I think the officer is going after this part - not disputing whether or not the helmet says DOT on the back, but whether there is any corresponding label on the inside that meets the requirements of the U.S. Standard.
We have all heard stories about the DOT stickers being sold separately. How do we know that it's legit unless we look more carefully? As far as I know there is not minimum thickness for an energy-absorbing material on the inside, the officer was likely just measuring so he could describe it in the trial.
My hunch is that if your other equipment was really not up to par, you would have gotten more than one ticket. Best bet is to put off the trial until after 6 months have passed from the date of the traffic stop so those charges can't be laid after the fact.
A Judge won't hear it because it's going to traffic court, not criminal court. Only JP's sit in the Provincial Offences courts. I wouldn't hold your breath on a jury either.
After reading all of this, I'm now curious if there is such a helmet that meets all those requirements.
A little off topic but I am offended by people wearing these Nazi style helmets whether they are DOT legal or not.
Given that CSA has withdrawn the only standard that they could have used to judge compliance (and CSA has not been in the motorcycle helmet compliance business for as long as I have had a motorcycle license, and that's a long time) ... there cannot be a helmet that meets all of those requirements.
It's my understanding that the latest Snell standard is closer aligned with ECE 22-05 to the extent that it is now technically possible for a full-face helmet to meet both Snell and ECE 22-05. Knowing how the Euro standards generally work, the BSI standard is likely identical to the ECE standard, or if not, so close as to make no difference. The DOT standard is a joke compared to Snell and ECE. So it is likely possible for a helmet to meet all of the listed standards except CSA. It will have to be a full helmet of some sort, not an open-face.
This guy was looking for trouble, that's why he was there, nothing else was going on so lets stop the guy on the bike cause i'm bored. Do ou think i didbn't see him? I was coasting down the street in neutral. Believe me, my bike is no louder than any other sport bike with an exhaust, or any other cruiser/chopper type bike. His first thing was i could hear your bike, ya, like you could hear any other vehicle passing by, the second reason was my helmet, it went down from there.......
You have no idea why he stopped you.
Imo, you are making a target out of your self. Your helmet (although DOT certified) looks like a novelty helmet. You have an aftermarket exhaust. You probably have a fender eliminator and after market turn signals. All of these things bring attention to yourself. Not saying the attention if fair but it is what it is. In a way your are just inviting random stops.
The thing about the helmet regulations are that they are poorly written. The cop could honestly be misinterpreting them. I don't know. He could also be acting like a dick, again I don't know. I do know that if I was a cop I'd pull you over for that helmet.
You have every right in the world to wear whatever legal helmet you choose but just be aware of what it really looks like.
You have no idea why he stopped you.
Imo, you are making a target out of your self. Your helmet (although DOT certified) looks like a novelty helmet. You have an aftermarket exhaust. You probably have a fender eliminator and after market turn signals. All of these things bring attention to yourself. Not saying the attention if fair but it is what it is. In a way your are just inviting random stops.
The thing about the helmet regulations are that they are poorly written. The cop could honestly be misinterpreting them. I don't know. He could also be acting like a dick, again I don't know. I do know that if I was a cop I'd pull you over for that helmet.
You have every right in the world to wear whatever legal helmet you choose but just be aware of what it really looks like.
The semi-colons at the ends of A, B, C and D take the place of the word 'OR', as it is used to qualify the last list item. It is grammatically correct and legally accurate, meaning that at least one of the five listed certifications must be satisfied.
You have no idea why he stopped you.
Imo, you are making a target out of your self. Your helmet (although DOT certified) looks like a novelty helmet. You have an aftermarket exhaust. You probably have a fender eliminator and after market turn signals. All of these things bring attention to yourself. Not saying the attention if fair but it is what it is. In a way your are just inviting random stops.
The thing about the helmet regulations are that they are poorly written. The cop could honestly be misinterpreting them. I don't know. He could also be acting like a dick, again I don't know. I do know that if I was a cop I'd pull you over for that helmet.
You have every right in the world to wear whatever legal helmet you choose but just be aware of what it really looks like.
Unfortunately, part of the price for appearing different is that you are going to occasionally get some unwanted attention.
Me stopped at a traffic light: Blue minivan. Car stopped at the light in next lane: red Mustang. Car behind: Cop. Light turns green. Guess which vehicle gets pulled over.
Same thing. It comes with the territory.
If you look at a few of the regs, where there are multiple options presented, you'll see that invariably the ones that have an "and" clause are separated by commas, which the ones with an "or" clause use semicolons. This is the sort of thing that officers need to be able to recognize, when reading the law.
I agree on the rest and it's best not to call additional attention to yourself, though a 3/4 helmet isn't the sort of thing that I've seen many 'novelty' versions of. It's usually beanies.
The bike is completely custom, built from the frame up, registered as no name. What do you suggest, i make it look more factory? That defeats the whole idea doesnt it?
It's what i like, it's my ****ing choice, and is within legal limits, it passed certification and and is 100% insureable, so because it looks a certain way I shouldn't be able to enjoy it?
Rob,
Why not have the and/or explicit in the wording? There should be no having to have a cop interpret the use of specific grammar.
Not sure why you are mentioning a 3/4 helmet as the helmet in question appears to be a Zox Chopper Helmet. The op posted a link to it. It seems to be a classic novelty beanie.
This is why I hate cops - Yea let's laugh over it, not like the person had to most likely lose work time to take a trip to the court to have it dismissed, let's joke about it.Going to complain to his Sgt will not result in much, (but it could lead to additional charges). I have been there at best Sgt will say "what were you thinking?" while they laugh over it..