Mad Mike
Well-known member
It's complicated, particularly when the practitioner is coming from countries that have a low bar for training and licensure, or places that use Soviet era technology and practices. Standards are high in Canada, as is the bar for being licensed to practice. Perhaps the bar is too high although I doubt there is much support to lower it.We'll see what materializes, it isn't going smoothly in other provinces and I don't expect it to go any smoother here.
My feeling is there should be a national licensing body that uses capability and credentials as the only scope for licensure. Right now we have a mishmash of provinces and provincial colleges making up rules. A national body could establish easier-to-use equivalency tests and straightforward pathways for practitioners licensed in countries with similar standards to Canada.