When I first read the news snippet the thoughts that came to my mind would have been deemed inappropriate for the fallen riders forum.
In short she was on a hill where tobogganing was banned. However I have learned more.
Her family moved to Canada from Lebanon six months ago so she (And the people facilitating the outing) may not have been fluent in French or English. How did they interpret the signs or did they just fade into the scenery?
The hill was man made, not unlike the one at Centennial Park in Etobicoke, and steep. There were obstacles including the sign post she hit. It identified some litter containers.
Dozens of other people were using the hill at the time. Everyone's doing it. It must be OK.
There is a lot of blame on the government. They made the hill too steep (The reason it's popular), too many obstacles ((Signs), not enough warnings (Signs), not enough enforcement (Police state). It's somebody else's fault. (See my rant on "Somebody")
The Dunning Kruger effect is a big part of the problem. The people who the sign was intended for think they know more than the person that calculated the risks based on physics and previous injuries. If the sign was an 4 X 8 sheet of plywood with 40 pages of data, how many would read it?
Everyone that encouraged the use of the hill by example is partly to blame.
RIP little one.
In short she was on a hill where tobogganing was banned. However I have learned more.
Her family moved to Canada from Lebanon six months ago so she (And the people facilitating the outing) may not have been fluent in French or English. How did they interpret the signs or did they just fade into the scenery?
The hill was man made, not unlike the one at Centennial Park in Etobicoke, and steep. There were obstacles including the sign post she hit. It identified some litter containers.
Dozens of other people were using the hill at the time. Everyone's doing it. It must be OK.
There is a lot of blame on the government. They made the hill too steep (The reason it's popular), too many obstacles ((Signs), not enough warnings (Signs), not enough enforcement (Police state). It's somebody else's fault. (See my rant on "Somebody")
The Dunning Kruger effect is a big part of the problem. The people who the sign was intended for think they know more than the person that calculated the risks based on physics and previous injuries. If the sign was an 4 X 8 sheet of plywood with 40 pages of data, how many would read it?
Everyone that encouraged the use of the hill by example is partly to blame.
RIP little one.