Driver loses control after passing motorcycles

[FiReSTaRT]

Perhaps the car driver didn't have time for a long drawn out act of stupidity RIDE OF THE CENTURY! I'd be getting edgy too behind a rolling roadblock too.

Century? Are you referring to the sum of the IQ's of the entire group? What a bunch of squids.

 

[AF4iK]

This seems to be a very difficult concept to grasp for some members here which see no fault on the riders

Not difficult to grasp at all. It's just that being a prick doesn't mean you're at fault even if people at fault are often pricks. And frankly, there's no evidence the riders were being pricks either, it was just assumed by everyone.

 

[FiReSTaRT]

Not difficult to grasp at all. It's just that being a prick doesn't mean you're at fault even if people at fault are often pricks. And frankly, there's no evidence the riders were being pricks either, it was just assumed by everyone.

1) A bunch of pricks would take up 2 lanes of traffic for an extended period of time

2) A bunch of pricks wouldn't clear the left lane when a faster vehicle approaches

I'd say they're pricks. Doesn't make the cager less of an idiot, but I'd be calling the popo on the riders for obstructing traffic. They can make it stick.. Even if the riders were going over the limit

 

[AF4iK]

1) A bunch of pricks would take up 2 lanes of traffic for an extended period of time

2) A bunch of pricks wouldn't clear the left lane when a faster vehicle approaches

I'd say they're pricks. Doesn't make the cager less of an idiot, but I'd be calling the popo on the riders for obstructing traffic. They can make it stick.. Even if the riders were going over the limit

1. No evidence it was an extended period of time. It may have been but you don't know that.
2. No evidence they intentionally obstructed another vehicle. Why is it you assume that the driver was just calmly following them for a while before deciding to pass? How do you know he wasn't driving recklessly to begin with? If anything, his behaviour suggests the latter more than the former but fact is we don't know.

I won't even comment on the calling the police part

 

[FiReSTaRT]

1. No evidence it was an extended period of time. It may have been but you don't know that.
2. No evidence they intentionally obstructed another vehicle. Why is it you assume that the driver was just calmly following them for a while before deciding to pass? How do you know he wasn't driving recklessly to begin with? If anything, his behaviour suggests the latter more than the former but fact is we don't know.

I won't even comment on the calling the police part

I saw them spaced out at a pretty long distance and none of the ones in the left lane were moving over to the right. To me, the video suggests more of a long-term occupation of the 2 lanes which is not cool if you have even a basic sense of lane discipline. As for calling the police.. Better to have them intervene when someone actually creates a problem in traffic than to just have them camp at a straight-stretch of good road and click their radar gun while gorging on coffee and donuts.