How many police cars have been involved in fatal accidents because of distracted drivers?
So you think they would fabricate a story to shed some guilt?I get your point but it’s not an entirely fair argument. Police cars make up a very small percentage of the vehicles on the road and police can say a fatality was a result of a myriad of things other than distracted driving.
Sent from my iPhone using GTAMotorcycle.com mobile app
And would. Reading some of the SIU conclusions is laughable. I still remember years ago, a cop drove straight into a jersey barrier in a parking lot at probably 50+ km/h on their way to join a chase that already had a half dozen cars involved. The car was crushed back to the A pillar. The report said the officer wasn't responsible as it was hard to see the three foot tall concrete wall across the entire entrance and he was driving slowly and carefully at the time. That kind of crap is what infuriates people.I get your point but it’s not an entirely fair argument. Police cars make up a very small percentage of the vehicles on the road and police can say a fatality was a result of a myriad of things other than distracted driving.
Most of the cops I know, 100% yes. And their story would be backed up by their buddies.So you think they would fabricate a story to shed some guilt?
So what is your remedy for this big problem?Most of the cops I know, 100% yes. And their story would be backed up by their buddies.
How many police cars have been involved in fatal accidents because of distracted drivers?
Watch out in halton/Oakville
The cops ride up to you on mountain bikes while you're stopped at a light
Don't ask me how I know
So you think they would fabricate a story to shed some guilt?
I'm not saying it is (I said so just afterward) but, from my understanding, people have been charged with all sorts of random things for filtering from police (reckless driving, stunting, etc.). I don't think it should be illegal, but the police should be held to at least the same standard they (as a whole) hold others to. In the same way I frequently see them on their phones (even ignoring the fact they're on their police computers as part of their work, which is also 'safe' according to them).
It's a double standard.
I understand emergency vehicle doing all these things with their lights and/or sirens on. but if its not, they're just another vehicle on the road that has to follow the law.Saw an ambulance mount the median to get a patient to the hospital the other day. Guess they shouldn’t do that either. Cops can also use flashing lights and sirens that you can’t. They can jump red lights too. Same with fire trucks.
Your argument isn’t going anywhere.
I understand emergency vehicle doing all these things with their lights and/or sirens on. but if its not, they're just another vehicle on the road that has to follow the law.
Was waiting at a traffic light and I saw a motorcycle cop lane filtering through the lineup peering into the cabin of each car. He was looking for people on smartphones, ready to hand out tickets.
Saw an ambulance mount the median to get a patient to the hospital the other day. Guess they shouldn’t do that either. Cops can also use flashing lights and sirens that you can’t. They can jump red lights too. Same with fire trucks.
Your argument isn’t going anywhere.
'performing the course of their duties'
How many police cars have been involved in fatal accidents because of distracted drivers?
So what is your remedy for this big problem?
Won't be long before they enable the software, that prevents any phone from dialing while moving greater than 5kph.
They just have to make up their minds and say f passengers, they can can call when they stop.
People are too stupid, that includes you, to be able to listen to the radio and drive.
Why put a phone in their hands that works at speed, and tell them not to use it?