I'd like to go back to something I said earlier which garnered no response. Overt v Covert.
Do you think it's less a problem to wage war on an entire culture if done more cost effectively and without feet on the ground? Because thousands of innocents are still dying and we write it off as "collateral damage". So we spend less; the results are the same or worse.
Arguing over budget reductions does nothing to sell me on the Obama the saint, and mark my words, Hillary would be worse than Bush or Obama, and Trump.. could be worse yet! but... I feel he's dumb enough to get himself impeached before causing any real damage. (fingers crossed) The hawk on the other side scares me more... Look into her past. She's in the wrong party, and I honestly think her marriage to Bill dictated that, otherwise she'd be a card carrying member of PNAC
This I agree with. Hilary is a Hawk and seems much more like a Republican than a Democrat. Conversely, Trump strikes me as more of a Democrat wearing a Republican costume as a joke. If you look over his statements and stances the last couple of decades he seems to have more Democrat leanings (leaving aside the rhetoric and ridiculous statements he has made during the campaign).
I really think he got into this election to stir things up a bit and get his name out there. I don't think he honestly thought he would get this far; let alone be the last candidate standing.
This could be just yellow rag journalism but makes an interesting counterpoint nevertheless:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/04/opinions/trump-just-being-trump-axelrod/index.html