D
Deleted member 50930
Guest
^
Investors buying 20 houses on 50 year loans
Investors buying 20 houses on 50 year loans
I would do the same if I had the option. 50 year mortgage? Sign me up!^
Investors buying 20 houses on 50 year loans
I would do the same if I had the option. 50 year mortgage? Sign me up!
50 year fixed rent is not a bad program. The problem with conventional rent is you are always 61 days away from a kick in the nuts.There's a word for that: "rent".
Nah. 50 years and the place is yours. Rent for 50 years and hope the landlord doesn’t toss you out, raise your rent, or screw around with your unit.There's a word for that: "rent".
Agree on the first few paragraphs. Not sure on the third paragraph. That depends on the interest rate. The first decade may only pay off a few percent of principal unless you really crank up the payments. My guess is if you are pulling a 50 year mortgage, most will be at the bleeding edge of affordability with mandatory payments.Nah. 50 years and the place is yours. Rent for 50 years and hope the landlord doesn’t toss you out, raise your rent, or screw around with your unit.
I’ll take a 50 year mortgage over 50 year rental.
And of course if you’re good with your money you can drop that 50 down to 30 quick enough.
I personally always get the longest term and crank the payments as if I had a shorter term. Poop happens and if it does I like my cash flow obligations to be minimized.Agree on the first few paragraphs. Not sure on the third paragraph. That depends on the interest rate. The first decade may only pay off a few percent of principal unless you really crank up the payments. My guess is if you are pulling a 50 year mortgage, most will be at the bleeding edge of affordability with mandatory payments.
Agreed. But you need to be disciplined to take advantage and invest the difference between the rent and buy scenarios.I'm standing by my statement.
On such a long amortization schedule, you are renting money from the bank instead of renting a place from a landlord for a long, long while. Much more lucrative places to put that money for that investing timeline.
As for being 61 days from being kicked out, how often does that happen? Ask that question to someone who rents, not someone who owns and fears the worst after reading worst case stories on the news.
Agreed. But you need to be disciplined to take advantage and invest the difference between the rent and buy scenarios.
Plenty would take the ‘savings’ and blow them on other fun things instead of invest.
A homeowner is a renter, so long as they have a mortgage. Interest charges are rent. Taxes are rent. If you’ve found yourself in a situation where you pay both of those, you are a renter.
Another thing to consider is a renter never benefits from the housing market appreciation, instead they're usually worse off as the cost is likely passed down to them.
Not to mention no HELOC
I know people that is has happened to. As for how often, I suspect that is correlated to length of time a renter has been at a property. In ontario, the longer a renter has been somewhere, the further the rent they are paying has diverged from market rent and carrying costs for the property at current market value. If a renter moves every two years, I expect it happens rarely as their payments are closely tracking market rent. Now, if a renter wanted to trade money for stability, they could allow their rent to track market prices instead of initial price plus yearly escalation factor. I dont know of anyone that does that.As for being 61 days from being kicked out, how often does that happen? Ask that question to someone who rents, not someone who owns and fears the worst after reading worst case stories on the news.
I know people that is has happened to. As for how often, I suspect that is correlated to length of time a renter has been at a property. In ontario, the longer a renter has been somewhere, the further the rent they are paying has diverged from market rent and carrying costs for the property at current market value. If a renter moves every two years, I expect it happens rarely as their payments are closely tracking market rent. Now, if a renter wanted to trade money for stability, they could allow their rent to track market prices instead of initial price plus yearly escalation factor. I dont know of anyone that does that.
My brother has rented a place for about two years. Property value has roughly doubled. His landlord bought it as an investment and has no real desire to be a landlord. Landlord seems like a decent guy but if he decides to cash out his investment, I see very little chance of my brother surviving the ownership change without a big rent increase.
You're coming from a position of access to money. Most renters aren't. A lateral move for my brother would be 30 to 50% more rent. Realisitically, he would need to downsize to keep rent similar. For those that have rented for decades, the situation is much worse and they are often looking at changing cities to try to maintain housing. Even in Barrie, seniors are being driven out and to find affordable rent are west of Angus. No transit available there so everything becomes harder as a previous walk to a grocery store is now a taxi ride.If you get evicted, then you move.
There are hundreds of things that can also drive a homeowner out of their house, from fires, ground erosion, toxic chemicals, etc. Worrying about things that are not in your control has never stopped someone from buying, it shouldn't stop someone from renting either.
If we got evicted, we could use the opportunity to find a place with a (much) bigger garage. Also somewhere closer to the ski hill. This kind of mobility and freedom isn't as easy for someone who has bought a home.
Some of us aren't tied to a place, or heck, even a country.
It's not a big deal.
You're coming from a position of access to money. Most renters aren't.