DownUnder
Well-known member
Can you see how your comment and mine can both be correct? Homeopathy was thought to be based on science....still is. But is not. Again, just because some people SAY the word "science" doesn't mean that it is. Science proved the world was a sphere more than 2000 years ago.
Under your article it says "see Pseudoscience".
pseudo- a combining form meaning “false,” “pretended,” “unreal,” used in the formation of compound words (pseudoclassic; pseudointellectual): in scientific use, denoting close or deceptive resemblance to the following element (pseudobulb; pseudocarp), and used sometimes in chemical names of isomers (pseudoephedrine).
Yes we are both pretty much on the same page. As our knowledge increases we find a lot of the things we believed in the past dont work the way we thought or are just not true at all. Who knows what people in 200yrs will think of us primitive people of today.
Arthur C Clarke had it right...it’s kind of appropriate for this discussion..
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Copernicus was condemned for heresy by the Catholic Church by using scientific theory to show the earth orbited the sun and not the other way around.
What we teach in schools about subatomic particles today is very different than was taught only maybe 20 years ago.
Science evolves (also religion often interferes with science).
This is what im getting at, over the last decade or so, science has almost turned into a religion where if you question the dogma you are attacked and shut down for heresy. There has also always been a crazy amount of money flowing into "studies" by partisan actors which should always be questioned and reviewd eg. oil, tobacco, communications and sugar industries. Whenever people stand to make or lose billions there will be disinformation and skewed scientific process.