If you're into FPS then your choice is b/w XBOX and PS4/5.
Would be the most budget-friendly over a VR rig.
Also have this big ass TV that I could put to use as well.
If you're into FPS then your choice is b/w XBOX and PS4/5.
If you're into FPS then your choice is b/w XBOX and PS4/5.
For sure. Plus I'm not knowledgeable enough about the whole VR world to know what type of games are out there, or how good the environment is.Would be the most budget-friendly over a VR rig.
Also have this big ass TV that I could put to use as well.
On another note. I don't play online, simply solo games. Online gaming has never appealed to me, and that's why the games I listed are the ones I play.
Well give it a try with someone Chinese,they will likely go ballistic its near as good as holding up your left hand when a Muslin man wants to shake hands.Is being mistaken for Vietnamese offensive to other Asians?
Honestly don't know.
Asking for a friend.
I love pho...
Well give it a try with someone Chinese,they will likely go ballistic
I don't play online either.
It's not that I don't like my ass being handed to me by a 10-year old kid in Bulgaria, it's the constant high-pitched childish yammering that's annoying.
So embarrassing when someone walks in and hears me blubbering like that.
Well give it a try with someone Chinese,they will likely go ballistic its near as good as holding up your left hand when a Muslin man wants to shake hands.
Equally opportunistic offensive here....
There are a lot of things that go into the numbers. The last time I was in Poland (2010) I don't remember seeing a single Chinese person. Today the entire Chinese population of Poland is still small, about 8,000 and travel between the countries is equally small. Canada has 8000 arrivals from China every 4 days. That might be a clue.explain Poland
I watched a good explanation of stats on CNN this morning. The infectious disease guy studied ships that were infected, his argument was that cruise ships were the only controlled samples - scientists have access to ages, health conditions, infection rates and outcomes. He argued the overall death rate to be .85% for the general population and .65% adjusted to healthy people under 70 years old.I've seen so many stats arranged in so many ways. I think it's still early days to trust in the numbers because of:
- inadequate testing, especially when it comes to COVID-19 confirmed cases. I trust the death toll numbers a bit more because there needs to be a post-mortem. But stats that show the US spiking in the last week or so are skewed because they just started taking testing more seriously in that time frame. Meanwhile, developing countries with very few confirmed cases? Well big surprise... their resources for testing are not as well-funded as the western nations.
- per capita deaths, population density. A lot of charts show the US leading COVID-19 cases, without ever mentioning that they have 10X the population of Canada. However, this is further complicated because although Canada's population density is more than 1/10th the density of the US, 90% of the population live in a handful of citiies, so I think our population density is very similar to the US.
- Another complicating factor is age distribution. A country like Cambodia had a huge genocide in the 1970s, so their population is relatively young. Only 3.8% of their population is over the age of 65. Compare that to Japan, where 33% of the population is over 65. Obviously more people in Cambodia are going to arrive on the other side of COVID-19 unscathed than in Japan.
I'm not a US apologist, I think their government is under-reacting and their attitudes towards personal liberty being more important than the common good is leading them to a disaster.
However, I think there are many, many countries that are doing just as poorly as the US, but because of all the reasons above, the stats are painting an incomplete picture.
Same here,I did notice that I'm in desperate need of a haircut though...
I watched a good explanation of stats on CNN this morning. The infectious disease guy studied ships that were infected, his argument was that cruise ships were the only controlled samples - scientists have access to ages, health conditions, infection rates and outcomes. He argued the overall death rate to be .85% for the general population and .65% adjusted to healthy people under 70 years old.
I'm not expert, and obviously not in the country but I do have a lot of family there.explain Poland
I'm not expert, and obviously not in the country but I do have a lot of family there.
The country clamped down hard as **** on everyone. Basically shut the country down except for actual essentials. Hotels, businesses, public places, all were shut down quickly. The national airline, LOT, shut down flights very quickly as well.
That could be part of it. But it could also be a lack of testing. However, just speaking with my cousin right now he said there's no mass hysteria, and overall people are being civil, and everyone is holding to the lockdown with no major violations in their area.
Some won't care but some might:
National parks in Africa shutter over COVID-19 threat to great apes
Virunga National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo shut its doors to tourists this week in an attempt to protect its great apes from possibly being infected by the novel coronavirus. The park, which hosts one of the last remaining populations of the mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei...news.mongabay.com
&
Everything we know about the pangolin — the scaly mammal that may have spread the coronavirus to humans
Pangolins are nocturnal mammals than are often poached for their scales. Their meat is also considered a delicacy in China and Vietnam.www.businessinsider.com
No it means if the rest of the primates get it, they can blame humans, they were smart enough not to eat the Pangolin'sSo....if it ends up being the pangolin, can we blame it? lol