Go to some places in Europe and try asking for a coffee. They'll just stare at you blankly or give you something wrong like an Americano.
They have 30+ types, but don't have coffee, as we know it.
I dont like the percentages shown on that chart, they are more a representation of the components, not the amount of each.Some of these are new to me. Never heard of a Romano before.
I like the callout between an caffe latte and latte machiatto - but the minute to stir them, they're the same lol
I've seen a lot of coffee shops have these sorts of charts, but most don't really follow these... There is no real discernable difference for most places between a flat white, a caffe latte, and a cappucino. Some pay more attention than others, but it's still not always super clear.
My grandmother taught me how to use one (stereotypical Italian boy here ) it's all in how you layer and pack the grinds. And never use soap to clean the pot, always hot water only. In the phobic world we live in that might scare some people but the coffee tastes better the older the pot gets.I have never had great luck with a mocha pot. I've tried many times and had old italian ladies make me some and its passable, but never my preferred choice.
An espresso in Italy - at least in rural Italy - is cheap, like 1 euro.
Damn, should have put the 189 towards a 58 mm machine. That size has been unchanged for quite a while so 58 mm tampers should be good for the rest of your life.I love rural Italy, we stayed last fall in Panzanno, just south of Florence. 1 km walk to the village, pastry and coffee was 2.5Euros, in the afternoon same place would serve gellato and tall boys (wives happy, guys happy) 1.5 for gellato, 1 for a beer. Place was heaven.
As much as the Italians take coffee VERY seriously , its unpretentious. Its just coffee.
Want KooKoo?? my son in law asked for a spring loaded pressure sensitive tamper for his espresso machine so the tamper would kick out at excactly the correct weight, like a torque wrench for your tamped coffee grounds for Christmas.
My wife says $189 for a 40mm tamper??? I said geez , we've spent more on stupider ideas, so he got a tamper
Starbucks is the bane of coffee imo. I don't think I've ever had worse coffee in my life than every time I hit up a starbucks. Acidity through the roof and burnt to ****...
On a similar note, the downside to the grind and brew coffee makers is that everyone I know that has one has on at least one occasion fired it up and make a pot of very gross liquid. The old grounds were left in, got moldy and then the new grounds were put on top and the pot brewed. Blech. Separate grinder and maker for me. Forces you to at the very least make sure the filter and grounds are fresh.Ironically Starbucks is closest to "real" coffee in that they generally follow the guidelines for making a "proper" brew. The fact that many people don't like it, finding it too strong or whatnot, is a symptom of the fact that here in North America we are accustomed to the often served black-water called "coffee" like Tim Hortons serves.
What's funniest is when you travel in the USA (the bane of all things coffee) and make a joke about how weak it is somewhere. They think it's normal even though it's almost universally terrible. When we were in Sturgis last summer we lucked out and found an amazing coffee shop (right next to the campground we were at, so it was convenient, too!) that actually served good coffee, although most of us Canadians were still asking for an extra shot in it to get it as strong as we liked. The ladies running the place couldn't believe that a bunch of us were coming in for 3 or 4 cups (at a pricy $5USD/cup) every morning. Totally worth it.
With only one exception at a little diner in the middle of nowhere on the way there, the entire rest of that week it was just one terrible coffee after another. I actually got one so bad at a restaurant that I literally poured it out of my travel mug on the ground before we even got back on the bikes and hit the road again - it was literally undrinkable, and that was an accomplishment because it actually looked like they had some high end equipment and I ordered a Red Eye hoping to get something strong enough to enjoy. The only thing I could figure went wrong is they were using some bottom of the barrel dredge beans or something.
On a similar note, the downside to the grind and brew coffee makers is that everyone I know that has one has on at least one occasion fired it up and make a pot of very gross liquid. The old grounds were left in, got moldy and then the new grounds were put on top and the pot brewed. Blech. Separate grinder and maker for me. Forces you to at the very least make sure the filter and grounds are fresh.
Ironically Starbucks is closest to "real" coffee in that they generally follow the guidelines for making a "proper" brew. The fact that many people don't like it, finding it too strong or whatnot, is a symptom of the fact that here in North America we are accustomed to the often served black-water called "coffee" like Tim Hortons serves.
What's funniest is when you travel in the USA (the bane of all things coffee) and make a joke about how weak it is somewhere. They think it's normal even though it's almost universally terrible. When we were in Sturgis last summer we lucked out and found an amazing coffee shop (right next to the campground we were at, so it was convenient, too!) that actually served good coffee, although most of us Canadians were still asking for an extra shot in it to get it as strong as we liked. The ladies running the place couldn't believe that a bunch of us were coming in for 3 or 4 cups (at a pricy $5USD/cup) every morning. Totally worth it.
With only one exception at a little diner in the middle of nowhere on the way there, the entire rest of that week it was just one terrible coffee after another. I actually got one so bad at a restaurant that I literally poured it out of my travel mug on the ground before we even got back on the bikes and hit the road again - it was literally undrinkable, and that was an accomplishment because it actually looked like they had some high end equipment and I ordered a Red Eye hoping to get something strong enough to enjoy. The only thing I could figure went wrong is they were using some bottom of the barrel dredge beans or something.
I'm with jc100. Starbucks coffee tastes burnt.
I've tried all of them, they all taste like crap.sounds like a blanket statement. without merit.
on any given day, they have 3 blends, a dark roast, a mild, and a blonde roast.
to paint them all as "burnt" suggests to me that one needs their taste buds readjusted. Drinking pizz Hortons blend will do that to you.
I've heard the uproar (wasnt drake complaining?) But have never seen on in real life.Does anyone else hate the new Timmy's lids? Have you ever had one not leak all over?
I'm calling shenanigans on your coffee farmer. One of the gals in our social circle is the former VP of Starbucks Canada, . To burn coffee beans in a Starbucks production roaster you'd have to override about 3 computer controls. Its not Jaun Valdez over a wood fire.