Would you believe him if he instead made a bunch of promises?No, but that’s all he seems to be doing.
Would you believe him if he instead made a bunch of promises?No, but that’s all he seems to be doing.
As long as he was 17 years old at the time I see nothing wrong with that :|... unconfirmed report that he had an affair with a 17 year old student....
Not if he/she was a student. In Canada that's going to be a sexual exploitation charge -- almost always ends up with prison sentences. There is no time limit on sexual offences, if a victim comes forward he's done politically, possibly criminally. A sex conviction means you can never leave the Canada as most countries will deny sex offenders entry.As long as he was 17 years old at the time I see nothing wrong with that :|
Globe and Mail will be doing back flips to confirm that story.
Because the party policy supports their interest. Big government, more services, more regulation and they are fine with swallowing the tax hikes.I'd rather a computer run the country for the next 4 years. Take the tax dollars and put them into the appropriate policies, that's it.
Turdeau is an embarrassment, and has obvious complete contempt for voters/staff/people in general. The whole veterans comment...yikkies
But that is pretty much a Liberal party characteristic. Say one thing but do the opposite. I am no Liberal supporter I am not sure how people can keep supporting them with two faced actions. ?
Because the party policy supports their interest. Big government, more services, more regulation and they are fine with swallowing the tax hikes.
Is this going to be just another smear the opponent campaign?
If so we need another check box for X - 'none of the above'
and if 'none of the above' wins, I guess we let the Queen of Canada fill in as PM until we can get our political $#@! together.
I like the earlier commentary about the PC Party
not only do the federal cons have a new name
they have very little in common with the party
that took turns with the Libs over the founding years forming governments
here's a little snippet of the party's founding:
a group of younger Conservatives from the Conservative Party of Canada met in Port Hope, Ontario, to develop a new Conservative policy they hoped would bring them out of the political wilderness. The participants, known as the Port Hopefuls, developed a program including many Conservative goals such as support for free enterprise and conscription. Yet the charter also included more radical policies, such as full-employment, low-cost housing, trade union rights, as well as a whole range of social security measures, including a government financed medicare system.
That last sentence is where you would define Progressive.
And of course they were from the east, great little town of Port Hope.
Since the party dropped P they are run by prairie hicks and bigots.
A re-branding of the Reform party.
And of course they have the sink or swim attitude of the extreme right.
So we have the choice of a Liberal party that swings wildly across the spectrum depending what the polls say.
Or a bunch of western bigots intent on destroying the social programs that largely define us.
Or some fringes: communists, tree huggers, with Utopian policies and no idea hot to pay for it.
Sad sitution.
Here's a link to the James Fiore leak. He seems really unhappy with the way the story is going to be release "to achieve maximum damage".
[/URL]
Apparently there is a non-disclosure agreement between Trudeau and the school that employed him. The Globe has a copy of that agreement and will release it soon. The girl involved will not talk - so far. This man would have been in his 30s when this happened. What an incredible indictment on his character and the lying façade he has put up to get elected. Just unbelievable.
Well this was certainly amusing to read, i'm curious why you chose to speak in extremes across the board instead of a more insightful post with the way you started off.I like the earlier commentary about the PC Party
not only do the federal cons have a new name
they have very little in common with the party
that took turns with the Libs over the founding years forming governments
here's a little snippet of the party's founding:
a group of younger Conservatives from the Conservative Party of Canada met in Port Hope, Ontario, to develop a new Conservative policy they hoped would bring them out of the political wilderness. The participants, known as the Port Hopefuls, developed a program including many Conservative goals such as support for free enterprise and conscription. Yet the charter also included more radical policies, such as full-employment, low-cost housing, trade union rights, as well as a whole range of social security measures, including a government financed medicare system.
That last sentence is where you would define Progressive.
And of course they were from the east, great little town of Port Hope.
Since the party dropped P they are run by prairie hicks and bigots.
A re-branding of the Reform party.
And of course they have the sink or swim attitude of the extreme right.
So we have the choice of a Liberal party that swings wildly across the spectrum depending what the polls say.
Or a bunch of western bigots intent on destroying the social programs that largely define us.
Or some fringes: communists, tree huggers, with Utopian policies and no idea hot to pay for it.
Sad sitution.
That option does exist. It's called "declined vote"and is a much better alternative than a spoiled ballot.I have used it once, and may use it again.Is this going to be just another smear the opponent campaign?
If so we need another check box for X - 'none of the above'
and if 'none of the above' wins, I guess we let the Queen of Canada fill in as PM until we can get our political $#@! together.