Chuck U. Farlie
Member
Pat Condell on aggressive atheism... I couldn't say it nearly as well as Pat does, so here he is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjO4duhMRZk
Pat Condell on aggressive atheism... I couldn't say it nearly as well as Pat does, so here he is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjO4duhMRZk
or the tastiness of seal meat?
People will say anything for a buck these days!
Seriously, he a comedian! That's like taking environmental advice from a politician! Or political cues from an actor! Or even believing anything said from a fat and disgusting ultra capitalist disguised as a revolutionary documentary film maker in a dirty cap! Who does that?
Can't we just drop this issue, and talk about things we all agree on, like the virtues of Stephen Harper, or the tastiness of seal meat?
Oh, but you offended the sensibilities of the religiotards. Dear me, I think I've got a case of the vapors, I must sit down.Nope, sorry Edders, can't drop it... not until all the religidiots drop it and I no longer hear a thing about their imaginary friend or religious institutions and schools are any longer funded by public dollars.
What sort of expertise does one need to comment on religion? Does one need a theology degree in order to make a valid comment to you?
I happen to agree with what Condell is saying in that video, so I posted it.
if you want to discuss religion, come on over to talkrational.org. Take the pressure off Paul.
Oh, but you offended the sensibilities of the religiotards.
Nope, sorry Edders, can't drop it... not until all the religidiots drop it and I no longer hear a thing about their imaginary friend or religious institutions and schools are any longer funded by public dollars.
Wow, is this still going on? I give both sides credit for being dedicated to their beliefs... Ding, ding... Round 6,048...
If there is a God, do you think these posts will be submissible at the Pearly Gates Courthouse?
"Sorry, I don't have time to deal with this mess... to Hell with all of you..."
Yours Truly,
God
No, because the "pearly gates courthouse" probably doesn't exist
The very concept of blasphemy is a perfect illustration of the cowardly immaturity of the religious mind and the emptiness of religion itself. If religion contained any truth, it could be ridiculed, insulted, even defiled without being diminished in any way. Its truth would shine through undimmed, unblemished, shaming those who abused it into silence. But that's not how things are. Religion is prickly, it's intolerant, it's ultra-defensive precisely because it's brittle and fragile.
One thing I particularly dislike about the religious is how they try to subvert freedom of speech.
Then there is the recent push (particularly by Muslim countries) for the UN to outlaw blasphemy. QUOTE]
I totally agree with you on Freedom of Speech. I also dislike how other religions try to force their beliefs; I'm not cool with that.
No one ever forced my beliefs on me, and I don't force mine on others. And I certainly do not think any less of people who believe different than me. I respect that you don't like the zealots, because I don't either. Just don't think that everyone who believes in the unknowable are zealots or idiots or otherwise intellectually challanged.
Dictionary.com defines a zealot as "an excessively zealous person; fanatic" a definition that has nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with people like Vlad and Worldtraveller, who persecute those who believe (or otherwise have differing opinions) with such zeal.
That's right Worldtraveller, I defined you in a dictionary! Don't make me break out the definition of "Atheist" and make you whine about that again!
I like Condell's take on blasphemy in the video I posted above:
The very concept of blasphemy is a perfect illustration of the cowardly immaturity of the religious mind and the emptiness of religion itself. If religion contained any truth, it could be ridiculed, insulted, even defiled without being diminished in any way. Its truth would shine through undimmed, unblemished, shaming those who abused it into silence. But that's not how things are. Religion is prickly, it's intolerant, it's ultra-defensive precisely because it's brittle and fragile.
Look, Edders, don't try to pretend like you know the least bit about me. Because the bits you think you know are either wrong, or you intentionally distort them to try to score cheap points.Edders said:I know others on this site agree with you, but you don't just disagree; you live and breathe atheism, well you and your buddy Vlad. If you weren't such a strong atheist, you wouldn't have an identity at all! Try to define yourself as something other than an anti-religious bigot, like maybe someone who's even a bit likeable.
me said:if you want to discuss religion, come on over to talkrational.org. Take the pressure off Paul.
1) I do post over there plenty. It's not my fault you're too much of a coward to also do so.Edders said:Hey Athiortard, why don't you follow your own advice?
There are many differences between you and me. One of them is that I don't assume that any reference to an athiest necessarily refers to me. You, Edders, are the one who keeps making this personal. This post of yours is nothing but a personal attack, on me specifically. So I will assume that means you don't have any real points. Feel free to provide evidence to the contrary.Edders said:That's the difference between me and you. You try to offend everyone who disagrees with you in the hopes of validating your own sorry existence. Me, I just try to offend you! (Sorry, maybe your phat IQ and science credentials help with your validation!)
Thank you for continuing to proove my point. Would you like to quote the rules again here so the mods know which ones you've violated? (I only point this out because you are such a hypocrit, I have no problems with your childish attacks.)You just can't disagree, you must also attempt to put people down. That shows the kind of (small) man you really are, despite your off-the charts IQ (which you claim doesn't matter anyway) and membership into a more exclusive club - the Scientists of the Mid-West or something like that. (a club for Kansas intellectuals? What's next, a club for American Communists?)
You flatter yourself (I suppose no one else will?). I like reading your posts for comedic value.Feel like putting me on your ignore list yet?
Really? So you arrived at your beliefs logically, after examing at least the majority of the evidence for and against your, and other, religions? I'll take that bet.No one ever forced my beliefs on me, and I don't force mine on others.
Now you're just lying. Show me an example of you or any other religious person being persecuted here by myself or any of the other atheists posting here? Go ahead, I'll wait. I have no problem with many believers. But this is a discussion board, if you are going to whine about us discussing your beliefs, maybe you should try a different pastime, like knitting.Dictionary.com defines a zealot as "an excessively zealous person; fanatic" a definition that has nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with people like Vlad and Worldtraveller, who persecute those who believe (or otherwise have differing opinions) with such zeal.
Hey, what's wrong with knitting?if you are going to whine about us discussing your beliefs, maybe you should try a different pastime, like knitting.
I've got nothing against knitting. Some of my best friends are knitters.Hey, what's wrong with knitting?
Are you trying to imply something here?
I've got nothing against knitting. Some of my best friends are knitters.
2) You are being a supreme hypocrit here. I did not call you a name, although, based on your responses, I think it applies to you
...you're too much of a coward ...