aprilia rsv4 | Page 2 | GTAMotorcycle.com

aprilia rsv4

I'm going to say none... but can't speak for him. They're a cassette style transmission like some other (usually homolgated) race replica designs, so you can slide the gears in and out simply... big advantage in professional racing but not in many other situations. I don't care much about it to be honest but Aprilia *really* think out the maintenance and functionality of their bikes.

I dont see the big deal, my 09 ZX6R has a cassette transmission that also comes out through the clutch cover very quickly and easily. And it came out in 09 on a much cheaper 600cc sport bike.. So its not like Aprilia invented the technology or are the only ones using it on stock bikes
 
You're right about that. But access may be simpler. I have not really worked on my friend's RSV4, just rode it, gawked at it and helped him transport it.
 
You're right about that. But access may be simpler. I have not really worked on my friend's RSV4, just rode it, gawked at it and helped him transport it.

Nope same design, mine comes out the exact same way
rsv4r_transmission.jpg
 
Last edited:
Look at that thing. What an awesome package. (that's what SHE said)
 
Hey guys.. i always ridden all jap bikes from 600 to 750, i wana step up, i always liked the ducs aprilia. So my eyes are glued to the rsv4 , see the pricing is very appealing... never own a literbike tho i have riden them... id like to have a bike u dont see around alot ..... so what do u think

Buy it. What's not to like? You'll have a ball with it. Its a differentiated ride - a good thing in a world of cookie-cutter sportbikes. Not that there's anything wrong with cookie-cutter sportbikes!
 
I dont see the big deal, my 09 ZX6R has a cassette transmission that also comes out through the clutch cover very quickly and easily. And it came out in 09 on a much cheaper 600cc sport bike.. So its not like Aprilia invented the technology or are the only ones using it on stock bikes

I think the 2004-2007 cbr1000rr have it also.
 
Too amusing...
Did a quick insurance check through a site that apparently offers an engine which searches for the best rates available....
Me - 41, 3 years riding, car license since 1987. Grand total of 1 at fault accident in 1989, 1 speeding ticket in 1995, 1 recent (December) ticket for unsafe left turn resulting in 1 accident (no damage claimed by either side... we would have just drove away after a hand shake cause there was no damage to either party (seriously - no exaggeration or embellishment), but there were 3 chickens (i.e. excitable women) who immediately called 911...
Police cruiser arrived promptly (was just up the street when he got the call) - I'm with Aviva, and apparently the police forward all reports to them automatically). After chickens finished squawking their story and took both our statements, cop gave me unsafe turn.

Quote for insurance: $8875.00 per year...

Of course, I know I can find better.. just thought that too funny.
 
Last edited:
Hahaha... that's hilarious. Try it for an 1199 now. Or a S1000RR...
 
If you have a car you wanna insure too, try State Farm... their bike rates are hard to beat, and should offset the slightly higher car rate.
 
Too amusing...
Did a quick insurance check through a site that apparently offers an engine which searches for the best rates available....
Me - 41, 3 years riding, car license since 1987. Grand total of 1 at fault accident in 1989, 1 speeding ticket in 1995, 1 recent (December) ticket for unsafe left turn resulting in 1 accident.
Quote for insurance: $8875.00 per year...

Of course, I know I can find better.. just thought that too amusing.



I rode with you once last year. I'd charge you twice that!!! :lmao:
 
Hahaha... that's hilarious. Try it for an 1199 now. Or a S1000RR...


I ensured my S1000RR with Jevco the first year. They didn't realize BMW made a superbike and charged me a cheap rate. The next year they tried to put it up about 800 percent. LOL, I gave them a pass.
 
Sorry to continue the derailing of this thread but....

I believe it is massively prejudicial of insurance companies to hold riders hostage to higher rates unless one insures one's house and car with them. What if you don't have a house or a car? That makes you a bigger risk? Absolutely not.

The riders of Ontario (and other provinces) are getting raped and seem to be enjoying the experience.

Rant over. Sorry 'bout that!
 
Sorry to continue the derailing of this thread but....

I believe it is massively prejudicial of insurance companies to hold riders hostage to higher rates unless one insures one's house and car with them. What if you don't have a house or a car? That makes you a bigger risk? Absolutely not.

The riders of Ontario (and other provinces) are getting raped and seem to be enjoying the experience.

Rant over. Sorry 'bout that!

This seems to mainly be a State Farm thing, though I could be mistaken.

I think the rationale is that some insurance companies (like SF) may be looking at motorcycles as an overall loss, and are using the lower rates to attract customers to their other products.
 
I think the rationale is that some insurance companies (like SF) may be looking at motorcycles as an overall loss....


Anything is possible however I don't know of many companies who would choose to do what they believe is bad business in order to get somewhat good business. As an example, I pay $400 for house insurance and $1,100 for car insurance. Not a lot of room to pad a bad risk motorcycle policy.

Actuarily speaking, at the rates some companies are charging, motorcycle business would be fantastic. The fact that most motorcycles are used (with the odd exception) for only 8 months of the year reduces their exposure immensely. Especially when the remaining 4 months are the riskiest to ride/drive. "We adjust the rate to account for those 4 months" is a crock. We know it, they know it, and yet we sit idly by....
 
Last edited:
Anything is possible however I don't know of many companies who would choose to do what they believe is bad business in order to get somewhat good business.

Its called a loss leader and tons of companies do it.

SF could easily be providing motorcycle insurance at/near cost, and using that to get new customers to bring their homes and cars along as well. I pay around $3700/yr for my house, car, boat and motorcycle. Some people pay that much just to insure a bike. The rates are all over the place.
 
Actuarily speaking, at the rates some companies are charging, motorcycle business would be fantastic. The fact that most motorcycles are used (with the odd exception) for only 8 months of the year reduces their exposure immensely. Especially when the remaining 4 months are the riskiest to ride/drive. "We adjust the rate to account for those 4 months" is a crock. We know it, they know it, and yet we sit idly by....

Look at the rider down/bike crashed threads. Most people are paying 1000-4000/yr for insurance. Most of those threads will involve the insurance company writing a check for 5 to 10 times that amount (assuming nobody was seriously injured). Insurance is expensive in Ontario due to the coverage offered and fraud that is difficult to prevent/prosecute with the current system. If Ontario suddenly had nice weather in the winter I am sure premiums would increase by 30% or more.

Personally, if I were an insurance company I would seriously consider not writing bikes, there may be some money to be made, but the pool of members paying vs the pool collecting just doesn't seem worth it. I fully expect State Farm to back off on their loss-leader bike insurance at some point (still be a loss (say Jevco-10% or so), but no where near their current rates of ~Jevco-75%). House and car insurance is profitable and predictable, but they must be losing their shirts on bike policies.
 
Look at the rider down/bike crashed threads. Most people are paying 1000-4000/yr for insurance. Most of those threads will involve the insurance company writing a check for 5 to 10 times that amount (assuming nobody was seriously injured). Insurance is expensive in Ontario due to the coverage offered and fraud that is difficult to prevent/prosecute with the current system. If Ontario suddenly had nice weather in the winter I am sure premiums would increase by 30% or more.

Personally, if I were an insurance company I would seriously consider not writing bikes, there may be some money to be made, but the pool of members paying vs the pool collecting just doesn't seem worth it. I fully expect State Farm to back off on their loss-leader bike insurance at some point (still be a loss (say Jevco-10% or so), but no where near their current rates of ~Jevco-75%). House and car insurance is profitable and predictable, but they must be losing their shirts on bike policies.

Im sure it would've been gone long ago if it didn't work out for them.
 
I agree. Insurance companies don't do anything unless its profitable. I got quoted insurance for a 12 S1000RR yesterday for $1189 full coverage with one speeding ticket from a year ago. I got quoted with TD. My current 600RR insurance quote by them is $580 yr compared to statefarms $1320yr. You need to shop for that RSV4. As a previous poster indicated BMW Toronto has one but they have not been responding. I am going there this friday and will see if it's still there. Good luck as the bike is gorgeous.
 
Its called a loss leader and tons of companies do it.

SF could easily be providing motorcycle insurance at/near cost, and using that to get new customers to bring their homes and cars along as well. I pay around $3700/yr for my house, car, boat and motorcycle. Some people pay that much just to insure a bike. The rates are all over the place.

I want a list of those "loss leader" companies to ensure I don't buy their stock. :D

You're telling me the rates are all over the place. Does that not sound some sort of alarm bell? If I'm a certain risk factor for one company should I not be the same risk factor for another?
 
I want a list of those "loss leader" companies to ensure I don't buy their stock. :D

You're telling me the rates are all over the place. Does that not sound some sort of alarm bell? If I'm a certain risk factor for one company should I not be the same risk factor for another?

State farm unbundled 'B' class rates are much closer to the other companies rates than the commonly quoted bundled 'A' rates. SF is losing money on bike policies, but obviously believe they are making it up with profitable home and auto policies.

For bikes especially, companies may have different categories (ie. age, engine size, bike type, sex, etc.). SF sounds like the majority of their rating is based on engine size, other companies have a heavy factor (300%+) on bike type that is currently not considered by SF.

If everyone was looking at the same data, the rates should be similar, if people are picking different metrics, comparing rates becomes much more difficult.
 

Back
Top Bottom